I think I did. The explicit gist of this article is that a cartoon showing Trump and Putin being romantically involved is homophobic.
I think I did. The explicit gist of this article is that a cartoon showing Trump and Putin being romantically involved is homophobic.
Sister site, The Clickhole made fun of this in May:
It depends.
YOU’RE GODDAMNED RIGHT.
A kid did that after scoring a goal in a U12 soccer game my youngest was playing in a month or so ago. The ref was pissed. He told the kid that if he did anything like that again, it was straight red.
Well, it is also about his pending eviction. Bias crimes are hard to prove. His defense is going to insist he was an anti-semite, sure, but that the eviction was the reason for the attempted arson.
I would think so. We’ll see as this series continues. He goes after Progressive politicos as well and we’ll see what kind of crazy stuff they get them to say.
“clearly hyperbolic for effect.”
Sure, but this wasn’t at the handshake level.
The key here is “slang terms & code words”
I don’t understand how Superman builds muscle at all.
Right. I’m an asshole for reasonably pointing out the obvious. And all the wrong people calling me a racist (for no reason) and claiming I’m lying about being a lawyer (for no reason) are not.
Both of us?
Standard ranges are not white privilege. Perhaps you could argue the charges pled to were because of the defendant’s race. I’m not sure what that’s based on, but otherwise, you had it right; a judge cannot be appealed as long as they sentence you within the standard range.
That’s fine. You are entitled to not believe I am a lawyer. And it really doesn’t matter if people on the internet think I’m a lawyer or not. You are like the tenth drone to say this. It just doesn’t make a difference. It doesn’t make my statement any less true whether I’m a real lawyer or a fake one.
I’m not sure what to make of your comment. It seems to be general advice that I don’t disagree with. You don’t appear to disagree with anything I said. It’s just like two boats passing silently in the night. Carry on.
Based on what?
You are wrong. I’m not a red hat. (lifelong Democrat, in fact) I AM a normie. (happily married with children)
Neither was I. I don’t think it does. Especially in personal injury litigation. Much more likely in criminal law or family law.
OK. Now what?