Brachiator
Singlestick
Brachiator

Inhumans. Mutants. X Men. It’s all so pointlessly confusing.

Isn’t there going to be a year delay before the next production of Doctor Who? There might not be much point in showing the new doctor now at all.

I don’t consider anything in “Rebels” or “Clone Wars” canon, so I have no problems with a Obi Wan movie. On the other hand, I would like to see a reboot of the prequels, throwing out 99 percent of those crap stories. And ultimately, there should probably be a couple of films that let us see how the Emperor came to

RE: The old gods are a nature-based, animalistic religion

I had a hard time getting past “director Guy Ritchie.” Also, the idea that a British director or UK based Disney casting people don’t know of any British actors of Asian descent is, well, un-freaking-believeable. 

There is more of this than you think. The Israeli/Asian pairing in “Fast and Furious 6" quickly comes to mind. But if it has to be limited to pairings of characters you care about in movies you like, then you will probably never be satisfied.

The questions have been asked and answered. Conspiracy theorists and plain jackasses always like to pretend that the questions have not been asked, or that mysterious forces or Big Pharma or evil big government or some other shady unidentified source is withholding vital information.

You’re a funny guy. There’s no point in talking about what is valid or invalid because the freaking season hasn’t started yet. Also, I was offering one of many possible reasons why everything is not necessarily rosy for Dany.

The Unsullied and the Dothraki are going to new lands. Lands where they can be free if they choose. Her advisors ultimately choose to serve her. They could just as well choose others. At some point, their debts have to be considered paid. The Iron Born are notoriously unreliable. They may need her now, but who is

Wonderful appreciation. Thanks.

I know no spoilers, have not read much speculation, but just in terms of drama, I would bet that at least initially, Cersie will do spectacularly well, if only because she seems to be so clearly over-matched.

RE: Funnily enough, someone did a study that book Bond is no more successful with women than the average traveling businessman of the time.

I read your post. I disagree with you about what makes a Bond movie “fun.” For me, it ain’t comedy. Not at all. I said that “From Russia, With Love” is the best Bond movie in because the action and thrills provide the fun. There is some dark humor. But no campy fun. No comedy. And the fight scene in the train

Sigh. I really don’t need a “Baby Han Solo” movie in which we meet all the characters we love in one film when they are younger. Actually, I probably don’t need a Han Solo movie at all.

Yeah, yeah, yeah, you want all Bonds to be like the first Bond you saw. And all Batman movies should be like the Adam West tv show. Not.

“Wonder Woman” deserves all the praise and success it has earned. But neither the movie nor DC should limited by the idea of the emergence of a “female superhero movie,” even though this was the hurdle that the film had to jump over. Movie goers have already shown that they will accept “comic book movies” with women

I’ve read that Coppola wanted to make the movie about female empowerment, which is already a lie with respect to many Southern women who depended on slave labor. I don’t buy the claim that she omitted the character because she was a stereotype. She obviously changed the way all the other women were depicted. When

RE: “So I decided just to focus on the women.”

Slapstick might be fun, if everyone knew what they were getting and agreed to it beforehand.