Blind-Prophet
Blind Prophet
Blind-Prophet

Couple of extremely key points about this...

I’m sorry in my attempt to be polite it appears I wasn’t clear. I have no desire to discuss the imaginary people you are crusading against.

Hi friend. As far as I can tell no ones been demanding anything. Nothing about it in this article, nothing about it in the source article. I don’t even see anything really in the comments here that even approaches a demand. I have not said anything about demanding anything. As stated to someone else I haven’t implied

Which is that as a group gamers have a tendency, at least in online spaces like this, to bitch about modern games not being complete experiences. And now we HAVE a game and a developer DELIVERING a complete experience and already gamers are asking for more deliverables.

I never said anything about there being an expectation for more, or that developers owe people more. No clue where you got that idea.

I’d like you to take a step back and think about what you just said for a moment. This isn’t a dig at you, but just something to think about.

Have you ever wanted to turn that humanoid enemy into a pinata but they keep turning you and all your friends into fresh corpses instead? Have you ever wanted just to get free crits with every melee swing? Are you tired of missing?

Unions are not so perfect that they are immune to critique.

Whatever you say bootlicker.

3.5 D&D can certainly be your favorite. But it being your favorite does not erase how flawed. At its best it was an utter clusterfuck of bad design from top to bottom and D&D today is still suffering because of it. Pathfinder at least bothered to learn from most of those mistakes eventually.

Whatever you say bootlicker

Don’t you have some boots to lick?

D&D 3.5 and Pathfinder 1st ed very much had/have a very vocal subset of the community that is very much focused on min maxing. That is in part because there’s a lot of bloat and ‘trap’ features (trap as in it looks good on the surface, but is functionally worthless) which naturally sent players towards finding what

Yeah the owlcat games are good, but they’re all based on 1st edition rules which are...well...D&D 3.5 with extra crunch. And when faithfully recreated...well you get a good game bogged down by the rules set.

The problem here is you’re using bad logic.

Go on. Do explain how your teaching methodology makes an unethical act ethical. Surely that can’t be too hard to explain.

your solution was so mind-blowingly insightful my small little mind couldn’t comprehend it until i read it three times. teach them to use it ethically and then show them the Adobe product!

actually, Adobe has its own that pulls from a massive library of art and images owned wholly by Adobe.

I was not rude. I merely suggested something you disagree with. You have some growing up to do.

So what you’re saying is you aren’t actually teaching them how to use it ethically, that’s just the lie you tell to make it sound like you’re a decent person when you don’t actually give a shit.