How can you consider some ads on vending machines the primary representation as opposed to Claire, the well written and well treated actual trans character in the game?

It never really was.

I’m sick of this take that worldbuilding-heavy series are somehow a “problem” and not just another style of storytelling that’s not to everyone’s taste. Some people like to see an interesting world deeply realised, rather than suggested in the background. Neither approach is invalid, but acting like art is dying just…

Jail will make them sure they wont ever do it again.

Someone’s gotta be made the example.

I know you’re slow and its very hard to understand simple concepts when you don’t bother to read.

Sure I’ll give you a short explanation since you don’t know anything about crypto, how it works, and have no interest in learning.

I’d suggest actually learning about how they work and their flaws and how those flaws mean they’re fundamentally designed to fail in the end:

I’m going to answer you.

Its a legitimate investment vehicle and should be part of a well-balance portfolio of investments.

I don’t think there’s anyway our viewpoints are gonna align on this.

So the only way that the show can be truly inclusive is by replacing Matt and/or other cast members with POC?

Where exactly in that paragraph you quoted does it say that exactly?

Should a campaign predominantly made up of white cast members only focus on “white” settings then?

Why are you insulted? What is insulting about that observation?

I’m a diehard leftist

The problem with talking about “cast members” is that...they aren’t.

Listening to criticism doesn’t mean that said criticism should automatically be treated as valid.

So why is it so objectionable to you for me to draw the conclusion that critics weight the various components of a game differently than players do?