Its a legitimate investment vehicle and should be part of a well-balance portfolio of investments.

I don’t think there’s anyway our viewpoints are gonna align on this.

So the only way that the show can be truly inclusive is by replacing Matt and/or other cast members with POC?

Where exactly in that paragraph you quoted does it say that exactly?

Should a campaign predominantly made up of white cast members only focus on “white” settings then?

Why are you insulted? What is insulting about that observation?

I’m a diehard leftist

The problem with talking about “cast members” is that...they aren’t.

Listening to criticism doesn’t mean that said criticism should automatically be treated as valid.

So why is it so objectionable to you for me to draw the conclusion that critics weight the various components of a game differently than players do?

You came so close to understanding and completely missed it.

It’s got that thing that so many reviewers, in my opinion, way undervalue (as is their prerogative, everyone has their own view on what is important) - it is fun to play.

Wouldn’t an actual socialist consider excess participation in materialism directly detrimental to their long term goals?

Do people expect him to donate 90% of his income and live in artificial poverty for the sake of an image?

Every emerging new tech is a scam until it isn’t.

Has there ever been a studio with this much money that is this publicly hilariously inept, out of touch, and thin-skinned at the same time?

Right, none of thats saying ‘China only for NetEase’.  Certainly means they’re trying to get into that market though.  

I’m really looking for where it talks about anything being “China-only for NetEase” but I can’t find a single mention of that.

No?