@Mireille is German for The Bart, The: you....you need to calm down.

@badmrfrosty: Here here. I mean, take Ratchet and Clank.

@mrjoeyyaya: Yeah, hang on, now. You might want to rethink that. Observation is a legitimate scientific procedure, but to incite...well, that taints the experiment. The observer cannot interfere, if the results are to be remotely trusted.

@mrjoeyyaya: See, I agree with you, to a point. But I find it equally true of the Sony crowd.

"It's not the fact that he's cute that makes me mad. It's that he's cute and better than me."

@Joel Johnson: Thank you. Also, while you're at it, get them to adopt graded reviews. Not that the reviews are the point of Kotaku, of course.

How do you follow someone on Kotaku? I've seen you around. Want to follow you.

Not bein' a smartass, but Chris Columbus ain't discover nuthin', yo.

Yeah, i see what you're sayin'. 'Can' and 'should' are two different things. 'Can' incorporates the rights, while 'should' speaks to the responsibility.

Yeah, like I TOTALLY disagree but i can TOTALLY see where you're coming from.

Ah. My bad.

Could someone help me out here?

@Arppis: Very important.

Nice article, Mr. Totilo. But is there a contradiction when you say that every game has a right to be released, then call a game company irresponsible for releasing it?

"Either way, I think we can all agree that no matter what, Lost will forever be a clearly divisive topic."

AHHHHHH YEA BOIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

"Would you like a puzzle completed for you? Would that be "fun?""

First of all, I wasn't being exact here when I said fifty fifty. My point was that I think people started to say more after the show ended than when it was airing that it was about the characters. To me it's just a away of letting the writers off the hook for ignoring their convoluted mythology.

@Dietomaha: To which you have just contributed.

@IcoSotc: