@AntiRad: Oh, hell, no. Don't skip the first one. It's underrated. I mean, yes, the second one is the better game, but the first is definitely worth playing. And I like Altair much more than Ezio.

Ah. Yes. Hadn't thought of that, for games with the online component.

I agree with this.

Kotaku is simply reporting on something that exists that happens to be mildly humorous.

Hey! Mr. Crecente!

@Troublehalf: Yeah...see, the point that he was trying to make in the article is not actually about the use of iron sights....it's about how many FPS games are actually in the pipeline vs. other genres.

Everything you just described is great, but it has nothing to do with a numerical score. What you have described is a problem you have with reviews.

/rant

"No release date has been specified, and it's my earnest hope that Terminal Reality is able to tune its lightsaber combat to more closely match your actions, rather than simply be triggered by them."

Rage.

Hey, Mr. Mcwhertor! Is there any indication of how you'll be communicating online? Like, a headset or what-have?

"When somebody makes a comment that is directed at a company or their respective game in a negative light [and is obviously not trolling], they are not calling out commenters."

@Tangent: See, word on the street was that this thing was more ergonomic than the 360 controller.

@BlackStigma: I...I think I agree.

@Paacman: Armchair criticism.

DAD! OMIGOD! MY DAD IS IN THE DESERT! I FOUND HIM!

@Giantmoth: Hey, I wouldn't sweat it. Bioware are cool, so you have no need to worry about ME3.

I know this has nothing to do with anything, but this is the closest chance I've had to bring it up natural-like in regular conversation....so....you know, indulge me.

@mindsale: Here here! And I'm agreeing with you as a fan of multiplayer.

Well, I think that eliminates a LOT of funding. A lot of arts funding is based on the premise that the artist can sell the result of the grant to get them started.