Bergh223
Bergh223
Bergh223

Hydraulic steering plus fantastic chassis, along with available magnetic ride control and mechanical limited slip differential (even without going to the V model), made this the best driving car in the class. Unfortunately a lot of the things listed held it back: infotainment wasn’t great (although the 2018 version is

Considered the ATS-V used, went with the CTS V-sport as the little extra size actually makes the rear seats useful. ATS was just a little small for the sedan segment, which is what us middle-aged guys with kids seem to stick to? Glad they’re keeping the coupe.

So far this year, the Fusion’s have been dominating and the Toyota’s have had flashes of brilliance. Chevy has had one win, Daytona. They couldn’t even get near the front at Talladega. So there is still disparging race car differences. That being said, I prefer close, pack racing with none of this side draft

There is also the template car. I know that ship has sailed, but in the 1980s and 1990s, you knew that certain makes would be better at certain tracks. For example, the Thunderbirds would destroy the Monte Carlos at the big tracks. Now? Is there really a difference? I get the sense there isn’t much difference anymore

Thank you for this post. He flails about trying to make motorsports into a stick-and-ball game. It just doesn’t work. All he’s done is make much of the season irrelevant with this “play-off” format and constant rule changes. I went from watching every race and every practice that I could, along with the Busch and

THANK GOD.

I jumped ship as a fan about a decade ago. The France descendants have led NASCAR into a period of constant floundering and desperate change. I’ve watched bemused by their actions from afar. Bill France Sr. and Jr. had clear long term visions, and the leadership skills to see them through. They had steady growth, and

Where? The driver. That was sad.

followed the youtube link to the forum, which had the receipt. always ask for a receipt.

The Demon driver got the better reaction off the line, but it didn’t sound like he got a good launch. You can hear him throttling the gas for traction.

The Road to Recovery is a load a horse shit. This guy did a line of cocaine and drank some light beer all night after winning a monumental race.

Drug tests for drivers?

How are they going to keep their energy drink sponsorship when the actions of their winning driver show that real drugs are better?

“No Trades. Serious inquiries only, I KNOW WHAT I HAVE!”

But can Puff drive?

As long as I can meet Rodney Sandstorm if I buy it.

Great racing =/= number of overtakes. And again, we see overtaking figures taken out of context. To the people commenting on how they can predict races after qualifying, please tell me more about how you knew a Sauber would finish 6th, both Red Bulls would crash into each other and out of the race, and Hamilton would

Hypercars are still no where near F1 cars in performance. When you see street cars pulling 6G’s in a corner, or going from 200 to 60 back to 200 in just a few seconds, get back to us.

There’s kind of an interesting conflict here between making races good to watch and making them fair and competitive. Like, the races this year have been absolutely thrilling, but I can’t say that it’s fair to have a race like last week’s where the winner was basically the only one who didn’t run over debris or hit a

“Never use your cruise control around a bend in the highway. It can cause you to spin out”