Bart_Y
Bart_Y
Bart_Y

OK...I’ll be the one to ask. If you knew you were going to make a trip to pick up the chair beforehand, why didn’t you charge the car the night before?

Or are you one of these folks that wants to look cool (or be “green”) driving an EV and has no way of (reliability) charging where you reside? I have noticed a

It would be smarter if we did away with taxes on productivity (ie., income taxes) entirely and shift to a consumption based system.

Explain to me how he’s incorrect.

I get it, you’re in love with government.

If you want to get outraged at the way corporations like this continue to get away with stunts like this, that’s fine. I am too. But let’s focus the outrage appropriately and understand who allowed it to happen in the first place. Democrats had free run of all three branches

Can you make the same assertion that the government is making the best use of our tax dollars? Probably not.

A large part of corporate welfare comes from state and local tax breaks. If these entities can so afford to give money away like that and still not run a deficit, then that means I’m either paying too much in

And as already mentioned, no one party has an exclusive monopoly on that practice.

It is a problem with both major parties in this country. 

Corporate subsidies do not have political boundaries. Politicians will support or oppose whatever gets them reelected, particularly if it means a big donation to a PAC. 

How about just letting people KEEP the money they earn instead?

Putting too much money into the hands of politicians isn’t going to end well, regardless of how well intentioned it is to begin with.

Beat me to it. The method of how the retailer is doing it is all that has changed.

Needs to make their way up to Clarke County, I’d love to strip some of those for parts!

Guess someone forgot to mark the road as being unpaved or these people didn’t have the “avoid unpaved roads” option set. Oops. 

And both died in the same plane crash, no less! 

You start asking these kinds of questions, and you just get crickets chirping.

We can’t build nuke plants fast enough to just flip the switch and say “no more fossil fuels!”. Then there’s still the problem of basic transportation for the hundreds of millions across this country that don’t live in heavily urbanized

Think early steam engines. Locomotives, steamships, etc. Easier to use wood than coal in most areas because of the logistics of hauling coal. Once railroads and boats capable of hauling large loads of coal became available, use of wood for energy production on an industrial level fell off. 

I have unintentionally given myself a small advantage over robocalls and other telemarketing simply by keeping phone number for so long. After two moves to different area codes, I can pretty much toss out any unknown number from my original area as a spam call (since spoofing your "local" area codes and exchanges is a

Yeah, because something is wrong that at least a few people in Congress expect people to act as functioning adults and not have the government “protect” them from every perceived evil in the world. There’s my libertarian diatribe for today.

Most likely because it is going to require all kinds of “oversight” to run

Rand likely voted against it because it is unenforceable. He’s generally against voting for feel good legislation just because. 

So says someone who is likely a renter.

Generally speaking, most of a typical individual’s net worth is tied up in their home.

So yes, it is completely reasonable for most people to be selfish about what is built near their homes. It is the reason why people oppose rezoning, highways, landfills, etc., being built near

Airline and those countries’ licensing/regulatory agencies.

There used to be a copper turned uranium mine on the South Rim. It shut down back in the 70s. Probably just some ore saved as a “historical artifact” from the mining operation.