So if I'm sliding forward and you run towards my foot and I turn my foot to the side before you impact me, I kicked you?

It looks to me like he is trying to stop it or kick it to his stick. But you are right, there is a fine line. I prefer the rule this way because before anything off a skate was no goal, even if the player were facing the other way and had no idea the puck hit him or if he was lying on the ice after being cross…

Good. I hate fucking unsolicited "characters" at sporting events. Take your fucking barrel and your hard hat and your fucking pig nose and get the fuck out.

I think what people deny is that Deadspin is in the "pro-Hernandez camp." It is impossible to read this post, or any post about Hernandez, and come away with that conclusion. So, it looks as if you may have seriously misunderstood...

How does #BlacklivesMatter and being Pro Hernandez equal? Hernandez did take a black man's life you know?

I'm reading an account of what happened with some insight. What are you reading?

Uh what do you think "liberal" means? Putting aside the fact that, if anything, this article would suggest that Deadspin thinks (as many of us fear) that Hernandez might literally be getting away with murder, why would a pro-murderer bias be liberal? It would be fucking stupid, is what it would be, but you seem to…

Where in the bible does it say "thou shall not bake cakes for sinners"? Serious question. No one is forcing Christians to have gay sex.

You have the freedom "to" worship whatever myth, legend, or fairy tale you want to without government interference, not the freedom "from" people you find icky. Stop butchering the Constitution to justify your very selective religious bigotry.

The new law wouldn't "allow businesses to refuse service to LGBT customers" but rather give businesses a hearing to show that they have legitimate religious freedom grounds to refuse service.

And let me guess, the extreme Christians will support like crazy the first bakery that refuses to bake a cake for a gay wedding and then will protest with moral outrage (and not the slightest bit of shame) when a muslim cab driver refuses to drive a woman or a person with a dog.

I can't wait to hear about all the LEGITIMATE reasons service is refused to individuals because of RELIGION. I am sure it will not be used to deny service to LGBT but rather for...?????? For what??????? What businesses right now are having their religious rights so infringed that they need A NEW LAW for the protection…

So If I get denied service for being gay, I probably have to put my money on the line to bring these fuckers to court, and if the elected county judge is a Republican I might as well burn my $500 in filing fees and attorney costs?

Actually, these bills have been a big deal for a long time while they have been in the works specifically because they are designed to do what Barry says they are.

Please provide an example of how refusing to serve LGBT customers because they are LGBT could be based on "legitimate religious freedom grounds" and not just legalized bigotry.

And how is a "legitimate religious freedom ground" defined, exactly? Any idea what the conditions on that are, or if there are even any at all? Hint: the people really driving the passage of this bill, like the people driving the attempted passage of similar bills in other states, are openly justifying their support…

I literally linked to the website started by the nutjob who started Paleo. Call me misinformed all you like and I'm sorry this means your carefully curated Pinterest page with recipes from your mummy bloggers is full of bullshit, but dude, it's part of the actual Paleo Diet. Which is total fucking horseshit, as many…

If any comment on this whole article deserved to be double-posted, it was yours. The Paleo diet is so fucking stupid, Scientific American called it "horseshit." Like, come on.

I suppose I could look it up, but...every time I hear the words "paleo diet", I picture some sticks and a dead lizard lying on a boulder in the dirt.