What about resharpening it, and then continuing to use it?

Thank you for using a semicolon; it's appreciated.

So, you're saying that back then, RO2 had similar issues?

Wait, what? What does a FPS have to do with this?

Virtual Boy! I remember some jet game that I loved when I was in middle school. We found the virtual boy in our bathroom, and it must have belonged to those who lived in my childhood home before us. I think we gave up on it with the Christmas gift of the Playstation 1.

A sunset patch would be nice now.

Ohhh. Well, in my defense I only watched around 15 seconds of the video as the tiny version!

What color wheel is that from? It's photoshop, but is that a new tool?

If you want to eek out even more performance, take a look at version 1.4 of gamebooster. (Don't upgrade, the upgrade is crippled unless you buy it.) You can also stop things running in taskmanager, and kill extra services. (I learned what scvhost.exe is last night after I wanted to get rid of services. In effect, it…

Well, yes. This is very true, and why I'll get a SSD/hybrid first. And then get the Ram.

I agree, my next purchase will be either a SSD or a hybrid for that purpose. Currently, I have a 7200 RPM drive as the scratch drive.

Do you use photoshop? I have a tutorial that can help computers with lower amounts of Ram by separating out the stitching proccess. It's here - Photoshop tutorial; red pill method

I keep an eye on the Task Manager's memory and processor graphs. Because of that, I know that while a better CPU would be cool, I need 32GB of ram, rather than 16GB. (I'm doing graphics and panorama stitching, not gaming. When a panorama is being stitched, I regularly hit the 16GB limit.)

What kind of costs are in the Free to play part of this? (I.E. what would I need to pay to have a better time, economically?)

Sometimes the link to the image isn't usable by Google.

He's commenting that it's hard to read. Your comment is the odd one, rather than his.

(It sounds like many of commenters are from Gizmodo and Gawker in general.)

Yes, this.