Why isn’t it circumstantial? Isn’t there more than one way to get someone’s DNA on something? Legitimately asking, because fingerprints are circumstantial and google suggests DNA is as well.

One of the stronger theories I think is that Colburn came across her car abandoned on the road two days prior and had it moved to Avery’s property. Whether or not the body was in the trunk or if they found her remains in the quarry nearby and moved them to the firepit, either could have happened.

I also think her…

The sweat thing as a smoking gun struck me as a little odd— Didn’t cops essentially have unadulterated access to Avery’s home for WEEKS? Couldn’t someone easily grab a dirty shirt from the floor and rub it on some things to get sweat based DNA onto them? Or is that impossible?

Right, its enjoyable, but a lot of stuff is overly telegraphed when it didn’t need to be. FA is a lot of fun but not above critique.

ClucksterTruck would be the best of both worlds, I think.

That poor driver is like “whaa——-argggg!!!”

Tyson Fury is a pretty good gay porn star name.

31 for me.
30 felt cool. 31 feels... “uh oh.”

Even if he’s not a secret liberal, I wouldn’t put it past him (when he loses) to announce that this was part of his plan all along and he fooled everyone and was just running to help the democrats. He is physically incapable of self reflection or admitting he was wrong.

“People who study Sun Tzu have called my…

Christ, the reaction it has to those squares. I didn’t think it had the ability to be scary looking but I stand corrected.

Now I KNOW that biker shop had patrons who were packing. Any “good guys with a gun” step up?

I imagine under that robe he looks remarkably similar to this:

Oh cool, good to know.

I can’t believe how stingy Naughty Dog is being with a story trailer for UC4. The clip was neat but seriously I would not mind a tasteful story trailer that A) set the stage and B) showed a new area!

Seeing as how phones can do rudamentary AR right now, I wonder if it will be that much more than a VR headset?

Not to mention the loopholes which should be closed, like the one that allows sales to be closed after 3 days even when background checks aren’t done yet that was exploited 15,000 times over the last 5 years.

It’s not a national standard because a good many gun owners and gun lobbyists find success in spreading paranoia about the government.

Since you want to point fingers at the liberals, lets not forget that Conservatives’ entire platform is founded on mistrust of the government. As if the government not knowing what…

The cities that ban open/concealed carry, that’s fair, though it suggests that all people who have been victimized by gun violence would be carrying if carry was legal. Some would be, sure, but not all. Probably not even MOST.

As for the children, who said anything about children? Your last two paragraphs are arguing…

But in your world, wearing a seat belt isn’t mandated by law because “criminals will find ways to not wear seat belts anyway.” Which, if you think about it, is an applicable excuse for literally every law on the books. Can’t outlaw murder because murderers will still find ways to murder people, for example.

Also, do…

Except the idea that they’re being legislated out of that choice is a conservative MYTH.

No one who has any real say in the matter is trying to ban guns. Period.

Many people DO believe they should be insured and registered, much like the cars, which are way harder to kill people with.