It seems like you think anyone pointing out how good white males have it, is attacking white men. They're not - they're trying to show how differently we treat someone who isn't a white man. It's not -attacking- you, or trying to take away your rights. It's trying to get that different person up to the same level of…

You baffle me. Did you not see the difference between those two comments you posted? The first guy was attacked because of (insert dickery here), not because he was male. The insults towards him were random, unengaged. The woman was attacked -specifically because she was a woman-; because she was a woman playing a…

What 'Jugger' said. If your -comments- are this well written, why not show how good you are in a real media setting?

I've had shit said to me when I play online games, too. But none of that shit was directed at me specifically because I have a penis. That's the problem - the caterwauls and ignorance towards female gamers isn't blind or opportunistic like the abuse we get (ie. Having had a killshot - 'FUCK YOU DILLHOLE!' - Of course…

Unfortunately, as you've no doubt discovered, the age of a man doesn't necessarily correlate with his maturity. Forgive me for assuming, but it sounds like you've had bad luck with men - and I'm sorry for that. But that doesn't necessarily mean we're all sex hounds.

I wish Gawker blogs had a 'like' function.

Seek men who are both more secure and mature.

Mea culpa!

Allow me to elaborate a bit more on the argument of 'prejudice against white males', which you appear to be making.

I'll get my quibble with your first point out of the way; Breast-feeding isn't a health hazard, it's sustaining another human being, and it doesn't come from the gonads (showing your breasts isn't exhibitonism, or shouldn't be!).

I'm not sure what your point is; The writer of this article isn't belittling men, she's making fun of the assumption that the movement for equal rights for women belittles men. It's like if I posted an article about how women should be made to wear burkas, because otherwise they can use psychological warfare to win…

She's being sarcastic, bro.

We need sarcasm tags up in this thing, evidently.

Go back to Reddit.

Thank -you-. I'm not a woman myself, and have never had an abortion (per the aforesaid). But I'm informed enough about reproductive biology to know that anti-abortionists are so full of shit as to cry brown tears.

You're making no sense. How am I reducing a woman to an incubator by saying she has a right to control her body; that she is more than the fetus inside of her, that she has more of a right over her body than the embryo? When did I -ever- equate a woman to an incubator during pregnancy? Incubators can't make decisions.…

Classy guy. Wonder how cold -he'd- be if this article was about his wife?

It would be civil of them to keep their ill-informed, objective opinions to themselves - and not to call women who get abortions 'sluts', as they did.

- 'Fetuses have brains before birth?' Yes and no. The fetus only has what we might call the beginning of a brain composite at the end of the first trimester (during which the majority of non-emergency abortions occur). Before that, it has a protobrain, a neural tube which has not so much as formed complete connections…

A bioethical one, to be precise. The most common definition of a person in philosopho/scientific circles is an individual that can maintain a self-aware, personal identity. An embryo, not being independant, much less thinking (as I am at pains to point out), cannot do so. Neither can an animal (by virtue of the fact…