You're looking at this totally skewed from an afraid fan point of view it sounds. 2-3 movies a year doesn't mean from the same IP. Lucas holds lots of titles, the movies can be live action, pixar style, etc from multiple IPs.
You're looking at this totally skewed from an afraid fan point of view it sounds. 2-3 movies a year doesn't mean from the same IP. Lucas holds lots of titles, the movies can be live action, pixar style, etc from multiple IPs.
Personally, I'd love to see a Pixar styled rendition of the Solo children's story all the way through "The Legacy of the Force" series. And then movies following regarding Ben's story which could be original. As we loose about two to three decades of his story if not more between LotF and the Comics.
Yea, I edited the duration prior to you reply, it just wasn't refreshed on your screen =D
Really, I could have sworn that the effects lasted for several months. But yep, just googled it and you're right it was roughly a month. I wasn't living in the states at that time, so all I got was the over exaggerated complaints from people over mumble.
Ok ok, so sony treats people who mod their playstations poorly and then are threatened to back off. They refuse and are brought down for a month? They fire lots of people and do lots of apologizing. Fast forward two years.....repeat history?
At least some people remember =)
"7. Thou Shalt Automatically Save Settings Once They Are Changed"
You definitely missed the point.
Agreed, I was thinking of that as well. That said, the vast majority of people I know ( I'm old enough to be friends with gamers that have kids old enough to game ) buy the lego games for themselves =P But yea, I can definitely see where an unknowing parent would blow a gasket. Especially with how tight money is in a…
Started reading the article, then scrolled back up to see who posted it. Thought to myself, "yep, that makes sense" didn't bother to read the rest.
You'd think that labeling misprints would be more of a "collectors item" now adays in the age of information than a need for a recall. But then again, I guess to whom does it appeal as a collectors item, just because it's listed as a demo.
Well done.
Don't worry guys, he's going to reply any time now with, "Fooled ya!" This has to be tongue in cheek.
Did you just call people stupid AND call thor a legitimate demi god in the same sentence? Not to mention belittling people for associating a popular icon with what it's etymology roots it to?
Check my second reply to Platypus.
Inherently, this isn't a "Norse mythology" easter egg. It's a direct reference to a scene from a marvel movie which happens to include Mjolnir sitting on a small cylindrical mound of mud.
Two points here. It's not the 90's anymore, and I was referencing the bit about fox news.
"Hutchinson on why killing kids isn't an option:
You have the concept inverted. It'd be like referencing Alice's classic dress or one of the many Cheshire cat re-imaginings and have someone reference it to American McGee's Alice. We know where it comes from as a root, but pop culture has a more timely reference.
"Couldn't it also be a reference to actual Norse mythology? Marvel didn't invent Thor or Mjolnir." Could it also be? Yes. In fact you COULD even say....It is. As Thor IS a reference to "actual Norse mythology."