Obviously more than GM can afford. 

I actually think Rivian’s concepts are pretty attractive as far as the plug-in-electric space is concerned.

Think you might’ve been in the Chevy dealership.

Mustangs around here seem to be driven by middle-level management and late-boomer/early-GenX senior technical staff. Or their wives.

Oh man I love this so much. It’s like a HotWheels fever dream. I literally guffawed at the picture of the rear end. It’s so silly. Like, dual-triple exhausts, who would even?

Digital photo of an actual photo on curling photo paper.

My mom special ordered a 1992 with a manual transmission but in late '91 an end of year sales event got us into this XLT Sport model. I was so stoked on the body kit and stripes. Legit this was like winning the lottery for me.

Or for people who just want a smaller, cheaper car!

I agree but only exception in my book is the Cayenne Coupe.  Not a bad looking SUV and overall better looking than the normal Cayenne.

They did make this though:

Nah, using Mustang design language as sport cues is good. Using Raptor design cues to denote ruggedness on other models is also good. Ford’s general design language is meh at best. Using actual good design language in their stable is good.

I think the CF front support/brace is the reason for that... it’s carried over from the GT350 and is the reason it didn’t get the refresh either.

Blink a few times, you must be thinking of a 2019 Camaro.

How much slower than stock will the Hennessy version be despite claims of 1000hp? 

Yes, I believe you are.

Is the reason it has the ‘15-’17 face because that one is inarguably better looking?  

1. Is there a factory painted bumper option?

2. How fast was your quarter mile?

3. OMG IS THIS AVAILABLE IN AN ELECTRIC SUV YET?

No one wants to 70k for a car that looks like it has a tacked on body kit and wing.

Let’s be honest, the people that want this car and are willing to pay the premium for this car are the same people that will need the special financing to afford it.