You should probably edit your response for grammatical mistakes when lecturing progressives about being taken seriously.

What gets me is that instead of holding Republican politicians responsible for their policies and votes, Democrats are yelling about Hillary Clinton vs Obama. Pardon my language, but seriously, get the fuck over it people. The problem is House Republicans who are willing to blow up the US economy if they don't get…

Apparently, you know enough to tell me which is the correct definition I should use in regards to my sexuality and sexual relationships.

Transaction means an exchange or transfer of goods, services, or funds; or an agreement between buyer and seller to exchange an asset for payment. Privilege is defined as a special right, advantage, or immunity granted or available only to one person or a group of people. The definitions of privilege and transaction…

What do you care to whom I reply? And which commentator was that was it katieupsidedown or sandra dee? Both made their points rather well, what more would you have liked me to have said to either one? And if stating not every relationship in life is a commodified transaction makes me terrible then ok, I'll carry on.

"All I'm saying is that this seems to be more of a difference of definition..."

No, in this case, I'm not looking at "transaction" the same as the way white-privilege deniers look at the word "privilege." And quite frankly, fuck you for implying as such.

A pleasurable action doesn't preclude it from being a commodity, but it certainly doesn't "always" make it so.

Friendship and love are not transactions; they are feelings. A transaction is an exchange of goods, services or funds.

Sex is not "always" something people are trading with each other; for many people sex is an pleasurable action they engage in, not a swop of one commodity for another.

So, I stated it did. I also said nothing about seperating sex and emotions. There was absolutely no insinuation in my post that sex should only be engaged in for love. What I said was my sexuality and sexual relationships with whom I choose are not a transaction nor am I going to let someone define it that way.

"Everything is life is some kind of transaction..."

I kept staring at it too. Is he trying to go for a Cesear cut?

I'm sure the Italians weren't that into them either so it works out well for everyone. Still, they will amuse me with the little things like not having a proper hair blow dryer. In the previews, the girls seem to be getting along which is usually entertaining. And the fight between the boys appears to be epic.

Yeah, I don't get the baby in bars thing. There are plenty of family restaurants you can take junior to and enjoy an adult beverage. Brother Jimmys aint it.

Nope, sorry going to judge. Rather than checking out how an American brand differs from country to country, I'd rather try local restaurants that inspired the McDonald differences in the first place.

Apparently, Dr. Snyderman is going with the 80's version of the UES as our symbol for privileged white people. Now, that era of NYC is as long gone as Reagan and his faux ghetto queens, but stereotypes die hard.

Everyone recycles clothes. Recycling underwear is just disgusting.

I never said she "stole" a spouse but she was a willing participant in breaking up a family. She is responsible for her actions. She doesn't deserve all of the blame but she is most certainly not free of guilt.

Sorry, she was a willing participant in an affair that broke up a family. The ulitmate responsibility fell upon the husband just like the ultimate responsibility of phone hacking falls upon Rupert and James, but she knowingly acted in a manner that dissolved a family. She is guilty.