Don't worry. The odds of your shitty god being the god are so low, I'd gladly accept my fate according to your god's shitty judgmental bullshit.

Now I'm judging you for being such a pushover. Christ wants you to tell me that I'm going to burn without His holy guidance. Why aren't you proselytizing me?

Stop judging me for my beliefs, Chris.

One time I altered the entry for "the Electric Slide" as a joke with my friends. It was a minor change. Maybe a few sentences at the end of a paragraph. Within five minutes it had been edited back with all of the bullshit removed.

Do you mean "cite?" It amuses me when people dismiss an open-source, referenced, reviewed encyclopedia because of baseless accusations of bias and error. It also amuses me when those same people misspell a four-letter word while implying that I'm wrong about Wikipedia's usefulness.

Dismissal of an article with 148 citations. What a surprise. I read about evolution on Wikipedia, too. I really need to rethink my epistemic foundations.

The Old Testament says polygyny is okay, therefore it is. Why don't you respect my beliefs?

You're not gay, are you? Why would it matter to you? I'm pretty sure that some 12-year-old boy in the Bible Belt who loves sports and is afraid of his attraction to other guys — he's having a better day than he otherwise would have.

So I have to respect your opinion if you think slavery is awesome? Or what if you use religion to back polygamy or touching kids?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian…

Being a bigot can you get fired. And that's what Broussard is. He's no different than past folks railing against interracial marriage, integration, premarital sex and cohabitation, women's suffrage, and, of course, the ending of slavery.

The guy's going to make, what, an eight-figure deal? You don't think he can afford to buy a couple dozen hats and return the ones he doesn't need? Hell, the NFL would probably give him all the hats he wants for the publicity they'll get from him wearing them.

So much arrogance from Kahn. How can you see a basketball player fail for five years and think that you can turn him into an all-star?

My attitude, as a guy with a graduate degree in literature who finds critical analysis much more important and interesting in rhetoric than in literary studies: to consider a reasonable totality of evidence on (nearly) any argument is to admit that (nearly) every argument is specious. With the exception of really…

Wait. Inhaling smoke has no impact on lung health? Iced bongs, vaporizers and edibles are another thing, but are you really telling me that smoking a joint does not affect lung function?

Well, I guess that solved the problem of self-important, misogynistic, mean-spirited sorority girls. A new day has come!

I hate burn victims too.

Kobe couldn't win shit without Shaq, Pau, or Andrew Bynum. Maybe Kobe didn't jump ship, but that's because he didn't have to. If LeBron had anyone like those three guys in his first eight years in the league, he'd have three rings by now. Minimum. LeBron is a top-3 player of all-time right now, this minute. The rings…

The sad thing is that this isn't really a matter of agreement. It's an objectively bad outcome. In order to justify it you have to make up some nonsense about floor spacing and how it will help the team in future possession by keeping the defense "honest," whatever that means.

That's a low-percentage shot that no player in the league can knock down at an efficient rate. Even if Jamal Crawford is the best mid-range shooter in the league (and he's not), when the ball leaves his hand that's a poor outcome for a scoring possession.