The list has 875,000 names. If you believe that a significant percentage of those people are actual terrorists, you are incredibly stupid.

Not necessarily. Here's the story of a Stanford Phd. Student who lost her scholarship because she was put on said list, and not given a reason why. She has been fighting this in the courts for almost 10 years. Turns out it was a massive FBI screw-up. And they did a good job trying to keep witnesses away, too.

Whatever... my 3 year old does all that and much much more during regular temper tantrums.

Sigh. And yet my husband has been trying for two years to get a job in education.

Well, he knows nothing.*

Any word on whether Jon Snow will finally know something this season?

Hi guys, I got engaged on Thursday! It was so sweet! We were at a nice restaurant (way to totally give it away, fiancé) and he got down on one knee. Our fellow diners clapped and sent champagne. I am crazy about him and very bummed he can't move here for a few months. How should I deal? Fiancé blow-up doll?

Hi and welcome to Gawker Media!

because it would mean the subjugation and exclusion of women from the church for 2,000 years was incorrect, and they can't be incorrect.

Was hoping for a twist ending.

What brilliant psychology major came up with these ideas you ask?

I don't have a burn book. I do it like the guy in Memento and just tattoo myself all over. There's a special place on my ass that reads "FLUTERDALE: REMEMBER HOW SHE'S WRONGED YOU."

They are actually a wonderful family, Geldof has always been a bit insufferable in his charity work but he took in his ex-wife's daughter after she was orphaned and raised her as his own with her sisters.

Anyone else here like the Paranormal Activity movies? Despite their many flaws I love them. I'm watching the DVD of the most recent one right now, with a bar of 85% chocolate and a glass of milk.

Cats come in both liquid and solid form.

I will always love Johnny, no matter what. We all get old, go a bit mainstream, make bad choices.

Really interesting, and I hadn't thought about it from that angle. I understand the reason for highlighting these guys' confusion and annoyance, but as as potentially undeserving individuals, it makes you think twice. I suppose I'm not advocating one way or another because I like how the issue is receiving…

people aren't upset about the photo because it makes them sad, which seems to be your critique of them. it's out of concern for the child's privacy. For the same reason newspapers don't usually publish gory photos of people dead in war — they didn't get abused or starved or die so that you could have a reaction and…

They shouldn't be posting pictures of victims, and especially not children. It violates a code of ethics amongst reporters and journalists. And as beneficial as seeing the faces of victims is to bring home the reality of abuse, there is a real person behind all of it. A child who was victimized and doesn't need his…

This is a huge violation of HIPPA laws and the photo should not have been released, much less reposted on this blog. The child's identity is as good as public now that his caregivers names have been published, his age mentioned and photo of back (with distinctive physical characteristics) released. It would not take…