Ah, actually, working out with weights and other interval training continues to burn calories well after you're done. It's not just what your fat ass sees on the treadmill after walking for 30minutes. Since you have no understanding of this, I'll assume you're also fat and out of shape which disqualifies you from…

Yeah. And that's why they're out of shape. Because in spite of all the science and the necessity to raise one's heart rate consistently in order to actually *get* a workout, some people have decided that never pushing their limits is good enough. You think that's alright? Or you think that's a poor example to kids…

What's conveniently left out of this article - and presumably speaks to the lack of true financial disclosure from a guy whose becoming more notable for bombast than anything else - is that most athletes go broke investing in *precisely* these businesses. Perhaps another interesting article would be a listing of all…

And for that reason, Andray Blatche, somebody who hasn't been charged, should be punished? What's your point exactly? That literally *anything* could be evidence of rape? The discussion was about the presumption of innocence, especially in light of an extremely unreliable witness. I realize this probably escapes…

This must be a new thing: 'Convictions Brought'. Never heard of that. Probably because it doesn't exist. And people have been convicted when there are *other* witnesses, you knob. Not because the 'drugged-up groupie' is reliable. Because she's not. She's been drugged. Fuck.... Stop arguing what you clearly…

Charges don't mean anything. Convictions do.

Legally speaking, yes. Don't look at me, cocksucker; it's precisely how case law has played out.

Because you can't defend somebody unless you cast doubt upon the accuser. When that accuser is an admittedly drugged-up groupie in a hotel room at 5:00am, that becomes a relatively easy task. It also wouldn't be the first time some woman tried to extort an athlete. And there you go, you knob; reasonable doubt. The…

That was brilliant stuff, the whole troll definition thing. You copy and paste that all on your own?

I was suggesting that she was an unreliable witness in the legal sense of the term. Clearly, she's confused about what she saw and what she didn't. Or, and the reason for presumption of innocence, there's nothing suggesting that it was definitely him. I'm playing devil's advocate for a reason. On more than one…

Yeah, and you'll be the first to be totally incredulous when he's found not guilty because you've decided that your idea of guilt is the one that should prevail. That's because you're a thoughtless idiot whose mind doesn't comprehend the myriad issues involved in justice and how it doesn't just protect people you've…

Oh, I don't know. Does her own admission of that hold water? Or are you just speaking to say something, you tool...

Whatever happened to the presumption of innocence? Many people have been accused of worse misdeeds from more reliable witnesses than a drunk and drugged out groupie and been found completely innocent. The fact remains that this chick is as unreliable a witness as could possibly exist and while it's interesting that…

That was a nice little bit of insecurity you revealed there by trying to impress people with something they didn't care about and didn't ask for. I don't remember the post asking for suggestions. Of course, you're probably one of those people who think everything they think is worth saying. I'm here to tell you…

Oh, sorry. I forgot this is Jezebel, but nice last line there. How about this: Any clues on how to ensure your daughter knows the difference between abuse and her own responsibility not to start fights and be upset with what happens when she hits first? 'Cause if you're only hanging around here, you're certainly…

Of course, because everything is as simple as that. A man is stronger than a woman so he should always respect that fact regardless of whether she's ultimately trying to steal something from him. He should just give it to her because that's a dynamic we could all be happy living with. I was never under the…

Of course, because everything is as simple as that. A man is stronger than a woman so he should always respect that fact regardless of whether she's ultimately trying to steal something from him. He should just give it to her because that's a dynamic we could all be happy living with. I was never under the…

Of course, because everything is as simple as that. A man is stronger than a woman so he should always respect that fact regardless of whether she's ultimately trying to steal something from him. He should just give it to her because that's a dynamic we could all be happy living with. I was never under the…

Of course, because everything is as simple as that. A man is stronger than a woman so he should always respect that fact regardless of whether she's ultimately trying to steal something from him. He should just give it to her because that's a dynamic we could all be happy living with. I was never under the…

Of course, because everything is as simple as that. A man is stronger than a woman so he should always respect that fact regardless of whether she's ultimately trying to steal something from him. He should just give it to her because that's a dynamic we could all be happy living with. I was never under the…