Yeah, but how can we fix that? What is it about women that makes them unwilling to sit in that casual, comfortable position? How can we encourage women to reject cultural expectations of their gender and be willing to sit however they want?

If anyone died, the responsibility would be on the ones who pulled the trigger, not on a company that released a movie. It is not the movie industry's responsibility to stop terrorists from being terrorists.

Presidential candidates are usually a lot closer to center than their extreme bases. I would expect most Republican Presidential candidates are far more agreeable than you might think, even if they're still disagreeable overall.

Being white males does not make them wrong and has nothing to do with the film, the hacking, or the terrorist threat. There's really no need to arbitrarily inject racism and sexism into this.

Does North Korea "hacking" Sony count as a terrorist attack? NO. Ditto for their little tough guy threats.

Going after these hackers with the force we did in Iraq would be a little more justified than, say, invading Iraq. At least there's that.

Technically, terrorists have won. These hackers threaten violence and Sony, being terrorized, caves to their will. Terrorists don't need to actually be violent to win, they only need to scare their victims.

Does it hurt you when a movie you don't want to see is released in theaters?

Not even foreign governments. It's possible they are, but they have as yet not taken credit for it yet. All we know right now is that hackers did it and the hackers don't want the movie released. It follows logically that they could be related to North Korea because of that, but it's just as easily a frame-up.

Just think of it is as a separate post-script season. The last season finale was the series finale, this is just the encore.

Uh, you're pre-blaming the victim for something that hasn't even happened. If a terrorist attacks, THEY are the ones to blame for causing it, not Sony or any film they may or may not release.

When I saw this, I wanted to make this post.

The criminals are dramatically outnumbered by non-criminals. When you assume all men are criminals because a small minority are, you're painting an entire demographic based on the failings of a small selection of them.

My take was that the cunning part was the mop apparatus. I still can't wrap my head around how that would work.

I don't know about everyone else, but I don't think I could ever trust anyone who sung a song like "Bills, Bills, Bills". I don't care if she's done good, positive work since then.

It's not just transgender people and racial minorities that are generally overlooked within the feminism movement. It's EVERYONE who isn't a woman in the Western world. So yes, this Game of Thrones star is right about problems in other regions being ignored despite them often suffering far worse fates. Furthermore,…

"If ours is not such a big problem then there's no reason we shouldn't be able to address it in tandem with the other bigger problems."

Uh, that method of using hesitant, passive questions rather than clear, direct statements is called being passive aggression.

This article missed an opportunity to offer intelligent commentary on the nature of this problem and possible solutions. Instead, we get a sexist joke about how we are all already aware that men sometimes take stupid risks. Yeah, we get it, men r dum.

I think most people would say that 3 years isn't long enough punishment for so severe of a crime.