"How we can stop this?"

Part of the patriarchy is the fact that women generally get their pick of men in courting situations. That's why this doesn't work the other way: if a lady wants a hot young dude, she can definitely find one through significantly less sketchy means. It's not some innate feature of females that none of them would stoop…

If that's the way you're thinking, you probably wouldn't last too well in any prison.

Prisons are unduly nasty in general. This is not a gender issue, this is an issue for everyone.

"The VERY worst that could happen is that the court finds a way to say that only an Amendment to the Constitution would clear the hurdle."

I kind of figured that might have been what was going on. Force the Supreme Court to find it unconstitutional, and when they do we have instant automatic legal same-sex marriage everywhere no matter what bigots might think. If Congress is too afraid of going against their constituents to do what's right for the…

Not exactly. Judicial review is not the primary function of the judicial branch and it is not actually mentioned anywhere in the Constitution. The primary function is to judge cases according to law. The idea of judicial review was interpolated from that primary function and it has come to be known as an effective…

Also for profit.

It doesn't matter how "well argued" the points are. The premise is flawed in its very core. If I wrote up an argument in favor of murdering disobedient children, I might be able to back up my ideas with "well argued" points, but the very core of the idea would still be incredibly unfair and immoral itself.

Only "somewhat"??????

I think a lot of people would describe any sex crime as "violent". Even cases like pedophiles with images who never touched a child.

Seriously? One nut calls into CSPAN and you'd paint all conservatives because of it?

Huh. This guy is a racist and hates the president, but not everyone who don't like the president is racist. Don't be ridiculous. There are plenty of legitimate reasons to not like the guy, this particular caller just has a bad one.

"Recently"?

It doesn't matter as much what she thinks it means. It matters what EVERYONE ELSE thinks it means, including the toxic members within the group she's distancing herself from.

are you talking about the celebrity philanthropist rejecting a polarizing term

...this woman who said this has achieved a lot and has received multiple awards for her good work for gender equality.

And what about gender inequity issues which don't fit into the framework of "women's rights on the grounds of political, social, and economic equality to men"?

No, I have to facepalm. Why are people thinking that EQUALITY is such a dirty word?

Probably more like she is aware of all of the troubles that women might face and would rather not see her child have to deal with those problems. I can understand that line of thought.