It must be nice to do such great reporting without looking into what has actually occurred. This article continues this train-wreck of a narrative and does nothing to repair the damage that continues to get worse and worse. I called for people to report the "person sending the threats", much like tons of other…

I was gonna say this

I don't think the community needs this kind of language and I have done nothing but simply point out what has clearly gone unnoticed, no reason for you to be upset.

[Trigger Warning] Doesn't change the fact that these are journalists posting articles.

[Trigger Warning] Doesn't change the fact that these are journalists posting articles.

I guess being dismissive is the best thing you could do, as opposed to engage in a discussion of why you believe what you believe. So, why do you believe what you believe? And why is it wrong?

I think this entire post went over your head.

Feel free to continue the discussion, but I have things to be doing and cannot afford to give the trolls any more of my attention. I will leave with some facts we have uncovered during this time:

I won't argue, im simply trying to imply that proof reading before posting should be a thing more commonly practiced. There has been a number of errors in articles this week that have been really obvious but simply overlooked. Not that I genuinely care, I get what they are saying and don't feel the need to be a…

Stephen Totilo is the Editor in Chief(with a degree, since some of you jackals like to degrade people) and does a fine job, engages with community on issue and is an all around good human being imo.

The humor tag is in reference to the content of the mod, not the article. My argument stands, the line in question has no place in this article and only exists as an attempt at criticism of some PC users.

I think you need to make an argument and stick to it, because you are doing a really terrible job of doing just that and you are doing an equally terrible job of picking good arguments to make considering I have on a few occasions taken issue with the choice of opinionated language posted in articles here when it…

Sorry bro, but I'm going to sit back with the laughs in the peanut gallery, rather than be the one to try to inform, spoil, or even help your trolling.

I don't find the mod to be satirical in any manner. We just need to face the facts, Gabe Newell is a ruling power in the industry and I have yet to see any mortal challenge his throne, have you?

What if the creator of the article didn't take personal interest in the subject? Seems like you are making a baseless claim.

Idk if you can tell which comment I responded to, so I'll say it's the one in response to Black Samurai where you started off with...hmm, no you did that a few times. The one where your 2nd paragraph starts off with " To comment on this mod being 'satirical' , what is satirical about it?"
It was after this that I knew…

I love the logic you displayed here, "My opinion is fact and denying it only proves my point". Since it would only "prove your point" I wouldn't dare deny your logic, but I will instead leave you with this:

I think what I have stated(aka my argument) and will continue to state is that the line in question doesn't belong in the article because it adds no value to the article, it doesn't belong. I do love the fact that you state that you aren't attempting to discredit the work done here, yet go on to discredit it anyway.…

You are quite the dedicated troll. I applaud you. Denying it will only prove my point. You entertain me. Carry on.

You are welcome to have your opinion, but it is probably best to step away from the keys if you can't present it in a constructive manner. I don't wish to imply that you are of a lesser intellect, but resorting to name calling is typically a sign of someone incapable of intelligent conversation.