Not a lot of police doing that either, but keep making shit up.

yep, you’re still dumb as fuck

Yeah because it will be so easy for them to get a job at $15/hr.

You can’t have it both ways here.

lmao you are actually retarded if you think europe isn’t way more racist than the US

Nothing stopped Sulkowicz from going to police - and I’d point out that if the college failed to find guilt, the police sure as fuck weren’t going to find guilt, because they actually have to use reasonable legal standards.

Not even remotely racist, but keep stretching.

The burden of proof is rhetorical nonsense used only by people who can’t see a way of actually defending their point. That said:

More like the recent NBER working paper, but sure, keep denying science.

“Here’s something Greitens won’t admit either: $7.70 an hour is not enough money for anyone to survive”

“I pointed out your “market-based solutions” were a pile of crap and that’s the best you can come up with?”

“The EPA is only ~60 years old, before that, I assume we had lots of “market-based solutions?””

No.

The amusing thing is that this is what a good EPA head would do too, except that Pruitt has no intention of replacing any of the regulations with market based solutions.

-> Point ->

“Living” is no more objective than “decent”.

“And the cost of the labor includes what it takes to house, feed, and clothe the people working.”

Goods only being priced at marginal cost is an idealized and impossible version of capitalism. If everything was required to be sold at cost, nobody would produce anything, because they wouldn’t be able to recoup capital costs.

It’s not economically feasible because employers can always choose to hire fewer workers and/or to change the price of the goods they’re selling.

Gives a giant middle finger to science, too.