It’s also completely fucking impossible, and yet another “policy” to add to the stack of dumbass shit AOC has proposed which only serves to prove she doesn’t understand reality.

oh look its another nolan article on economics that proves him to be a complete retard

http://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/-alexander-presentation_10063532278.pdf

I mean non-wage compensation would enter into it, sure, but not enough to clearly make the cliff disappear.

I mean, there exists a welfare cliff for single mothers that makes them better off earning $29k gross yearly income than they would be at $69k gross yearly income.

There are actually enormous welfare cliffs where earning more money dramatically reduces your effective income, but they’re all related to stacked welfare programs and basically disappear if you’re making anything close to a normal income.

“Is it fair to characterize all teen boys as budding attempted rapists until proven otherwise?”

No competent economist thinks MfA is a good idea. Even in the class of single payer healthcare, MfA is a shit idea.

dumb as fuck

lol literally the opposite of the lesson you should be taking from this but ok, keep dreaming

way to be wildly dishonest in your reporting

Crossing a picket line is unequivocally *not* wrong.

Elon Musk was not a co-founder of OpenAI.

we can only hope its you

I find it hilarious that you don’t realize you’re doing exactly the same kind of mental gymastics that people use when they try to justify using racial slurs, and somehow don’t notice.

you are actually so stupid its incredible

“$90 million is a far cry from the most Capela could’ve gotten in free agency, but his position is heavy on supply and light on demand”

I love how this was fine when it was only getting white men fired and now its suddenly a catastrophe when “marginalized” groups like rich white women aren’t allowed to be complete fucktards to valued members of a community without cause.

if it made economic sense, it wouldn’t be newsworthy, and wouldn’t require any kind of legislation

I like how you completely ignore the fact that this has reduced the costs associated with actually purchasing these services dramatically, which is a vastly more important outcome.