Yes, it does. But that’s better than what happens when you raise the minimum wage - which is that employers externalize the costs by raising prices and reducing their demand for workers.
Yes, it does. But that’s better than what happens when you raise the minimum wage - which is that employers externalize the costs by raising prices and reducing their demand for workers.
Negative Income Tax is the ideal. Expansion of the EITC if you want it only to go to workers.
Here’s a thought: maybe if you want to provide people with a minimum livable income, you should do it with a policy that actually makes sense.
Or just get rid of retarded zoning laws and kill all NIMBYs?
what kind of monstrous cockend *wants* their cat to be in a different room at night?
“Might be genetic” is correct, though.
oh yeah cuba and venezuela are doing so well now
“Valuing “bipartisanship” on the really important issues is an admission that you have no real beliefs.”
I like how you didn’t actually provide an answer key because it would completely shatter your attempt to create a narrative.
“Those regulations were created as a direct result of the financial crisis of 2008, and, as imperfect as they were, helped to guard against the conditions which lead to the nation’s economy having taken a nosedive.”
I like how you managed to be part of something that is unquestionably a failure to treat athletes with even basic dignity, and manage to turn it into a story about how *you* were mistreated.
In what world is saying “no ur wrong” ‘schooling’ people?
You say “Any truly universal national program will come with a similarly large sticker price.”
Morality is a matter of opinion, friend.
Men are equally likely to be victims of domestic violence as women are. Please do research before making bold (and false) claims.
“They’re covered together under the federal Violence Against Women Act because both predominantly affect women.”
“ They’re covered together under the federal Violence Against Women Act because both predominantly affect women.”
“First off, you’ve now disproved your original point: There’s apparently neither blatant favoritism of blacks or blatant favoritism of women on this site if commentors can switch gears like that.”
I mean, a month ago or so there was a story about a NFL draftee allegedly punching a woman who was hitting him, and the commentariat overwhelmingly came down against the dude.
Yes?