I don’t think people aren’t saying it’s not an issue.  Clearly as this lawsuit shows it is an issue people are having to deal with.  I think most are saying it shouldn’t be an issue and is a problem the US legal/copyright system. If you put a tattoo on someone it is now a part of their likeness. The artist should…

So here’s a question... If I buy artwork from an artist... Am I not allowed to display that art? To take pictures of the room with the art in question without the artist’s permission? If I am, then why should tattoos be any different? ... The alternative is that this dude cannot take any photographs of himself without…

I still ran into a weird one - I was a 15 year old king (grandson of the previous king, no other viable heirs) and about the time I got started, I got a “bully” who was 4 years old and had the ability to turn other children against me. Me. The king. Bullied by a 4 year old and his toddler friends.

The Pope can no longer publicly accept cannibalism.

“You can no longer lose a friend you didn’t have”

“You can no longer be tortured to confess a secret you don’t know”

I still don’t understand, I mean, all of it, but once specific piece:

If you want a recommendation, the CDC’s committee stands by the advice to get your shot by the end of October. Anytime before that is fine. 

This was fairly informative - I didn’t know a flu shot “wore off”. I do question this line:

Some people need to spend less time on the internet. 

I suspect this is more of his attempts to look ‘tough’ on China. The problem being, the moron doesn’t understand that China outright owns roughly half the US economy. You can’t be ‘tough’ on someone who owns half your body. The only thing you accomplish is punishing yourself.

Haha, yeah, like that time the Nazis jokingly adopted the swastika as their symbol of hate, sure fooled everyone!

Remember that the trump presidency started as a joke on the simpsons. 

The racist meaning of the OK sign might have started as a hoax but nobody “bought it hook, line, and sinker”. It was completely ignored until the wider groups of white supremacists and neo nazis picked it up and started using it unironically as a new secret symbol. Even then the media and public still didn’t take it…

No, it started as a trolling campaign and then white supremacists including the Christchurch gunman ran with it.

bUt iT stARTed aS a jOKe

Where are all the ‘good cops’ condemning this? 9 months that photo circulated among their colleagues and not a single one complained? It’s safe assume then that the people who saw the photos aren’t ‘good cops’.

Waiting for the inevitable “This is not who we are” apology from the officers as they prepare for new jobs with other police departments.  

So their idea of cheering up a fellow officer is “remember how you totally murdered that guy? Here’s us reenacting it!”

They are mocking an innocent man that was tortured to death by their police force.