It's annoying, stupid, irrational, and hot.

Mess-free sex? Nooooo. This is a prime example of how women differ amongst other.

Maybe you could stand that side effect... but I would not date a guy who didn't ejaculate. I really hope male birth control comes to exist; I also really hope there is a different way.

"The ability to provide a money shot is the only advantage to being a man," wrote one internet commenter. "It's the reason we put up with war, brother. This will never, ever work."

You can make manic plans when you're manic. "I'm going to do this! And then this!"

I really wish Jez would do a modicum of fact checking, if only to provide citations that aren't provided in the news articles they summarize.

I had the same reaction. Sadistic child abuse is a different can of worms, even when the perpetrator is a misogynist, and even when he's a misogynist who would encourage not just sex-selective abortion but infanticide.

Anyone else reminded of Samantha Bee on the Daily Show — "You can rape it or you can protect it but you can't ignore it"?

Sounds like me on my nightly drunken phone call with my mom.

All women are real women. But thanks for playing.

Oh, Christ. Ok. I'm feeling slightly patient at the moment.

Umm... she was straight with him by not engaging and typing on her phone. Do you see mixed messages in that? If so, you need a refresher on the idea of enthusiastic consent. Could you elaborate on why a woman shouldn't respond to a man through public mockery — why it's "mean" and "mean-spirited" to put a guy on blast…

What's next is: she was scared and said "maybe later" and then afterwards claimed she meant "no."

Public consensual sex is dumb if someone capturing it and publishing it is not an acceptable risk to you. So is being a douchebag: don't be a douchebag if you're not willing to take the risk of someone making your actions public.

Thanks for saying that! I can't quite bring myself to wade into that mess and actually address the comment. It's the most annoying kind of mansplaining: civil and polite and "reasonable," while being totally and obviously bullshit.

I think the essence of this commenter can be detected by his use of a single four letter word here, where he lists things he supports:

Yep. Hugo's single mistake in this piece, in my opinion, is the use of the word "attractive" in that sentence.

Hey — yeah, what raineman said. You have to be starred to see the pink comments, and no one can answer them without promoting them, and no one wants to promote them, and so no one answers them. So, no discussion. That's why I copy/pasted.

"Is it feminist to write for Jezebel, after the mostly-female commentariat has made it perfectly clear that they don't want you here, but can't do anything about it?"

Here's the content of a pink comment, by one Chris Tobin: