Well, sometimes they also dislike it when a study paints women in a light that many might see as positive - such as, women are more nurturing or something - but that doesn't fit the narrative Jezebel wants to push. This particular one really could have gone either way, I think, depending on which author had…

No need to beat around the bush. The former happens when the study paints women in a negative light and it's the latter when women are shown to be superior. It's so predictable at this point.

• Cat box cleaner

I spent three hours snuggling on the couch with my partner and it was heaven. He's messy, and spoiled, and selfish, and petulant and emotional and whiney, but he makes me laugh until I can't breathe at least once a day and we sleep face to face in a tangle of legs and window-rattling snores. That part is good, but…

While I anecdotally agree with the study's findings (and it ties in nicely with the whole men are logical thinkers while women excel in associative thinking), I agree "HILDA" does not seem like the best place to collate your data from.

I find it so weird how Jezebel reports on these sorts of studies. If a study points to there being some kind of difference between men and women, half the time Jezebel will be all skeptical and suggest the study must be using sexist methodology or working from sexist assumptions. But then sometimes, they will…

Question 1: Why would you get totally naked to have sex in a car?

"....while they were naked and in the middle of each other...."

so is it lose-lose for whites then? (yes i know how that sounds).

you are what is wrong with America.

She is not asking for a fucking prize.

But men aren't emotional.

Neither do they deserve to be accused of wanting a prize when they haven't, actually, asked for one.

The best part about the comments section here are the well-intentioned folks that just get eviscerated by people looking to be outraged. You don't have to look, outraged people! There is plenty to be angry about; stop taking it out on people who mean well (even if meaning well isn't quite good enough).

The point seems to be that white people, even if they are "good" should "know their place" and stay there. Now where have I heard that before?

WHERE IS MY COOKIE?!

Not every high-pitched noise is a dog whistle.

Your assumption here is a problem. You assume that the commenter is looking for a prize. They aren't. They are saying they don't need to apologize for sympathy and empathy which is offered without reward to all walks of life. That the automatic assumption (on your part, it would seem) that they are saying these…

i think too many people see empathy and support as being somehow attention whoring. I'm sure there are is a small group out there who act supportive just to feel good on social media, but most are people who are disgusted by police violence, inherent inequalities, institutional racism, and the kind of dismissive…

I thought it was a wonderful piece, but I sincerely doubt that most good white people—or at least the good white people who run in my circles—believe that they "deserve a fucking prize." I think they're expressing empathy.