Nope. like you said, and I indicated, words DO mean something. Please re read my comment.

Sorry BrewCrew, it appears logic is not supported here.

I think your’re over complicating this on purpose or accident. BrewCrew used a similar argument against bison78.

You didn’t need to convince me, but the whole country, when a presidential candidate was under constant scrutiny by the FBI. Guilty or not, you can understand how that may put a bad taste in some mealy mouths. But Clinton, being a robot...? check SNL skits, check any satire commentary about her campaign, she was like…

Racists are white, don’t be white!........

I feel we agree, there was a whole rejection on how a swath of people have been treated for the last 8 years, that will motivate people to action. Lets keep the swears down though. If there was ever a time for understanding or “civil” dialogue it is now. :)

You’re perpetuation the same problem with Ashley’s article:

You have to understand that any “List” one puts up against one side, there is an equal or larger list for the other. Want to talk about fake foundation? You want a womanizer Trump in the oval office? You want a womanizer Bill BACK in the Oval office? The fact remains Trump didn’t win, Clinton lost by ignoring too many…

The amount of orders don’t matter, their impact does.

If that is how you want to spin it, sure. But I like to think of PC as civility.

I never said I support him, but Ashley, and others, making blanket statements about guilt by association is disingenuous and poor reporting. And supports my statement that it is comments and articles like this that has revved up Trump voters. But I think you missed the point, and you are being far to generous about…

You missed the point on purpose or unknowingly. An endorsement does not equal an acceptance of said endorsement, not by a long shot. I think that is a very silly first sentence for Ashley to lead with. But she is getting the reaction she wanted,....

Curse words won’t help an argument, just like the bad things Trump has said, why perpetuate that dialogue? He did say lots of crappy things, my point of the comment was Hillary has done crappy things and why are people surprised with the outcome. I’m not endorsing Trump either, but putting my thoughts forward why he…

Thats pretty crappy news in a crappy time for the US. I hope our new Pres can avoid any indoctrination. He was not my first choice :(

Crude language won’t progress you point and distracts from a debate. I believe the electoral college was instituted for allow minority-population states a voice, to not be walked over by states with higher populations. Kind of giving voice to the minorities among us etc.

Watch the language the argument will be more engaging.

What BrewCrew said was that people don’t like to be called racist, even if it is true, but thats a different story. There was not much ambiguity that I could tell, sorry if I missed it. My main gripe returns to people not liking what Trump says - including me - but people like a lot less what Clinton has actually done.

We can get into the weeds all day, and we can talk about whose supporters are accosting whose. (I don’t know the details, and no, I am not there) I am not trying to avoid your comment but pointing back at my original comment - People are turned off by what Clinton has actually done, more so than what Trump has said he…

You, and others, keep bringing up the racism or Trump and (me or others, not sure?) but that is exactly what my post was about. I appreciate the play by play deconstruction of my comment but it just kind of proves the sentiment. You can’t label someone a racist, you don’t know them. you don’t know Trump, and…

I think you missed the point, intentionally or unintentionally. BrewCrew82 said that people don’t like to continually be called racist, not that all of Obamas policies and agreement/disagreement to said policies id driven by racism. Those are two vastly different things.