I'll believe that one when the promised energy storage tech becomes more than vaporware.

beat me to it

I'll just leave this here.

MN-12 chassis, not Fox. this car has noting in common with the mustang other than the engine

Most of these trucks have a rearend ratio between 6.00 and 6.70:1....even the diesel ones. And this is a 15-20,000 lb truck......so i call bs even with a diesel. 8mpg is a lirtle optimistic

ive had to work on both Cummins and VM motor I engines (not in pickups mind you).

ohhhh so true.

i work with a guy a lot like that. you're wasting your time he hasn't got a clue and will refuse to get one

maybe over the road. this truck being a vocational truck would be so short geared that it can't be possible

nah, this truck would of had a 8.2l detroit diesel or a 3208 caterpillar for a diesel.

Just what the wolrd needs, another Bro-Truck..... smokin' the pipe

why would you want to put a boat anchor like that in this car? it'd just go slower

and pure H2O2 isn't poisonous? well maybe don't need to worry about lung cancer like with hydrazine, you just need to worry about the stuff eating your suit, and skin and bones.

could you imagine how many of these Ford could sell???? Slap a SVT badge on the back (or whatever they are calling themselves these days)

and just how much difference is there between diesel and unleaded?

no... there is no throttle blade.

I don't believe that's a Pontiac mill, it should have an open space between the bottom of the intake and the lifter valley....it looks like a generic chebby engine. it is kind of hard to tell though for sure

looks like a chevy 350, not a pontiac 350....means the trans is a chevy trans too.

i find it somewhat amusing that the national media has "discovered" the Royals.

Eat Taco Bell, wait 24 hours. that was easy :D