Please point out where I said they did get sued for using the iOS name?

"In 1988 Al Gore sponsored the National High Performance Computer Act which created a national computing plan and began connecting other Universities and Libraries to the existing ARPANET network."

This is not always true(see AMD for an example), but assuming you were 100% correct, they could use them in lower end / alternative devices or continuations of past devices.

Maybe they can use the additional cores to actually load background info when the GUI is in use.

In b4 countless "but we never went to the moon"morons show up.

Some of the browsing business was the crap browser. ICS is much improved [ I used to use Dolphin or Boat on HC because the browser was so horrible].

Honeycomb has the ability to GPU accelerate, but the 'all-apps' override in the stock settings on ICS is very very very nice. Night and Day IMHO [HC 3.2-> ICS]

touché!

"Android has a knack for feeling slower, because of the way, for instance, that it animates transitions."

No, all of your examples were from an American [not world wide] perspective. That's the problem. You're only talking about one country, not the Internet.

Geeks may like Firefox, but nerds use lynx.

The troll shall set you free.

Percentage-wise, this is nothing....

Your move iTunes.

Getting off drugs causes hairloss?

On the flipside, less drunk military men overseas will help our loss of intel.

What i'm wondering is if this is based on open source and can be modified like the kinect.

If it doesn't matter who was first, why do we have patents in the first place? Fail logic is fail.