You’re fucking blind if you mix a Q50 dash up with a Venza. But you write for Jalopnik so I guess that goes without saying.

$2500 more for a car you’ve already put a deposit on so it can be built in a tent in a parking lot

So therefore the only reasonable option is to make big, huge trucks legal only if you are using them for work purposes. Because there is literally no reason why anyone would need one of these beastly machines for their everyday driving—and definitely not in the city.

Why? I need van capacity at work and home not sedan so but a van right? No I need SUV for SUV things. Back to 3 cars when 1 will do? Boo

The Ford rep just meant it doesn’t matter if it’s a clay model or a test mule, the point here is that the shape does represent what we should expect from the production model.

The aim of the teaser was to give us a “peak” at what will, more or less, be the profile of the new Bronco.

I feel like the story here is

I guess that depends too on just how far down the accelerator is. Drive along at a normal cruising speed and you’ll only be using a small fraction of the power available and the brakes will easily win (I actually experimented with this once). Apply full throttle (no, I don’t know why) and it may be a different story.

After reading this, banning Manhattan sounds like a more appropriate action.

There has got be an airplane mode, but for cars, such that only navigation and basic text/call is on. That, and WILL YOU JUST FUCKING PUT YOUR PHONE OUT OF THE WAY OR GO HANDS FREE YOU FUCKING DEMONIC ASSCUNT FROM THE 665TH CIRCLE OF HELL?!

no, it is not.

Are you fucking serious? How is this the NRA’s fault?

can confirm, that is in fact a mustang

twice doe

These abilities, however, were not a revelation to me. We’ve driven thehell out of the Fiat/Miata.

OK, I did it. It’s my fault.