So brilliantly rightly wrong that I craughed (cried and laughed at the same time).

Last sentence made me lol.

Toot away.

Is this real life?

Counterpoint: It’s 2015 and a lot of men are “eating the booty (and pussy) like groceries.”

A moment before the ref stops the fight, Lemieux takes a vicious body shot and looks directly at the ref as if to say, “please make this man stop hitting me.”

This is a great post.

“... rainbows of unity burst out of a brown unicorn’s ass.”

“You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.”

This deserves to be out of the greys.

Maybe. Or you might just act superior, which you clearly are, and include an overly long and mostly inapplicable humble brag about what a good person you are. You wrote what you wrote, dude.

Because I disagree with you and do not automatically turn the other cheek and/or forgive people who casually use the word nigger, you have sarcastically referred to me as “a better person” and implied that I am not “a civilized adult” or a “good person.”

I agree, nobody deserves that, but do you think that his use of the word nigger was a mistake? It sounds like you agree with me that this person was a bigot (you wrote asshole) and that his use of the word nigger was evidence of that fact, which was the thrust of my comment.

I guess we are discussing two different things. Do you forgive someone for a mistake? Yes. For being a bigot? Not so much. If someone uses the word retarded, I may excuse it; faggot, less likely; nigger, probably not.

Bullshit. Someone who uses that phrase or one like it is only embarrassed because they used it in mixed company.

Why on earth does anything you wrote suggest one should be exempt from judgement?

Off topic: Unfortunately, this amazing book is destined to become a disappointing movie.

Then your friend sucks.

Your article misstates the facts here. It has not been firmly established that higher testosterone levels confer an advantage for women athletes. Importantly, you left out the fact that the CAS decision explicitly gives the I.A.A.F. an opportunity to provide “actual” scientific evidence of an advantage.

I love this comment.