1littlefishie502
1littlefishie502
1littlefishie502

Can I watch Peacock on a Trivection oven?

Proud as a Pea-COCK, baby!

God, I would hope so. While in bed:

“Your droids. They’ll have to wait outside.”

I think you just discovered the identity of Snoke.

I say no more Christmas as a “central” holiday. Celebrate Jesus’ birthday on December 25th if you like, because that’s what Christmas is.

A lot of these symbols are from the Pagan ancients! This is not to deny you your feelings. You should still dislike Xmas, but it’s sad for me that many of my secular friends don’t enjoy it all. For me as a child it was about magic (I won’t bore you here, my comment in this post explains it). I like the controversy of

Maybe instead of being included in the kids ap by an algorithm then reported out, they should be crowdsourced in, with users flagging vids as kid-appropriate, and tagging specific content elements (cartoon violence, age-appropriate but about sex-ed or drugs, etc.) so parents can tailor filtering to the kid. Make the

Omg imagine all the diseases you would catch from your phone if this was real

The median income in America is $50K. He makes almost double that at 23. This is cannot be understated.

You really are an awful troll and an unbelievable piece of garbage. The guy is clearly trying to figure things out, and obviously has some wrong presuppositions, but is open and trying. For that you’re dragging him.

I don’t know if it’s jealousy that this guy is more successful at 23 than you currently are or some

You need to cut back on the social justice Kool-Aid a little bit. I read his letter over, and what you saw as “How do I parlay my wealth to women?” I saw as “I’m proving a stereotype wrong.” He’s clearly uncomfortable with the wealth he has. He knows he can use that to put himself in a situation that’s abusive in a

But... he’s trying to change and be better? He literally wrote to an advice column for that reason, and you’re shitting on him because he sought help in a semi-public forum?

Wrong:

If nothing else, at least this guy has the balls to admit that he’s clueless and ask for help. He freely admits that he got lucky and is making, fresh out of college, more than double what entire families in his hometown make; he has every right to be confused after a major social shift like that.

The damndest thing? Pullman made the perfect Evangelical Christian story by ragging on the Catholic Church. I mean Dust might as well BE God. It is everywhere and in everything, grants you insights you could never have without it, allows for impossible things to happen, and communicates with people. It is the perfect

What I’m saying is that Lewis isn’t directly suggesting the sex = damnation equivalency you’re saying he is. He’s suggesting that accepting worldly desires into your life over a relationship with god is a recipe for damnation. That’s the clear purpose of the lesson being put forward. The whole language of “lipstick

You’re defending a rank bullshit misogynist

Having actually studied Lewis in college, and spending extensive amounts of time on Narnia and his other apologist writings, I can say with a fair amount of certainty that you’re reading far to literally into his point made with Susan’s situation. Lewis has no issue with women wearing makeup. Lewis has no issue with

The point Lewis was trying to make was that if a girl puts on makeup and has sex then she should be damned. Misogynistic bullshit.