Welcome to the left. Conform or get your label.

Gee, the one unifying theme in all these was a dislike and mistrust of Hillary. Something much of the left agrees with. Someone remind me why the DNC pretty much anointed her as the nominee again?

Actually, after watching the video, 100% (yes, 100%) of the fault is the ASSHOLES that are going way, way WAY too fast for the road conditions. I see it every single fucking time it snows out here in WI, where people think that they can just keep going 40mph+ in snow, on ice, and without any type of snow tires…

Am I the only one that places the blame on the shithead motorists driving too fast for conditions over the top of a hill?

Very much so. Should electors be bound? God yes. But the EC as a mechanism itself is a vital thing to our system. I’d even argue that after the corrective that was the Civil War, the EC has played perhaps the biggest role in keeping the US as one nation intact. We wouldn’t last 50 years if we got rid of it.

Complaining about the electoral college after the election is like complaining your (American) football team should have won because it had the most offensive yardage. Both sides knew how the game is scored and played accordingly.

Depends on who you voted for. I voted Hillary and actually enjoyed this article, even if it’s not satirical. It’s a good balance to this site and all of the other Post-Gawker sites.

There’s always been a difference between “shut the fuck, you’re being an idiot” and: “You can’t/don’t have a right to say something.” I’m fine with the former and despise the latter. The original idea of fighting back against casual forms of bigotry in speech was a good one.

The idea of free speech is not that all speech should be defended by the people. In fact, the whole point is that speech that is bad SHOULD be roundly denounced by rational people. But, the government should not be in the business of restricting people’s speech. That’s all that the 1st amendment means. Would the…

Noam Chomsky disagrees with you. He asserts that media censorship comes in the form of the industry only recruiting, hiring and grooming people who posses certain political ideologies. That the other opinions never make it through journalism school because they either self select out or are made to leave.

Everyone I know who voted Johnson voted Republican down ticket. That’s just 3 people and completely anecdotal, but if you really forced Johnson voters to pick Trump or Clinton, I’m not sure it would’ve swung the election in her favor anyway.

I think he did. If anything Johnson most likely helped make this closer for Hillary than it otherwise would’ve been. Trump won whether Gary Johnson existed or not.

Where they fail is where the Lesabre shines!

This is the correct answer to the problem. My property does not get to determine whether I live or die, not for orphans, not for priests, not for the president.

The question was, who does he admire. A good answer, and probably the truth, was, no one.

The question was “who was a foreign leader he admired.” I can see where he might have a problem with that since there aren’t any worth admiring.

Seems to me libertarianism is about as American as it gets. Socially inclusive yet wanting freedom from overbearing government. Problem is, few people know what the Libertarian Party is about and think it’s some sort of anarchist Republican spin off

The question isn’t why is she so determined to fuck it up. It is why Democrats voting and caucusing during the primaries thought that such a thoroughly flawed and dishonest human being should be President.

“Sun’s rays don’t melt lady bones!"

You should change the headline - even if just for this woman's sake - yes, she had an abortion but she did so for a very specific reason and it's click bait to leave the headline as is. I was horrified by the title and then immediately realized it was misleading.