1cba3
Nope
1cba3

Did you miss the part where I said the vast majority of drugs come in through already established entry points? They don’t smuggle them in through the middle of the desert, that’s absurd. They hide them in vehicles and drive in through border checkpoints. The DEA and even John Kelly himself have acknowledged this.

he explained that players will often move or even lightly toss the ball right after the play in order to manipulate where the ref spots the ball.

Yeah, undocumented immigrants are a net positive revenue source. They pay taxes and pay into SS, and largely don’t receive any public services or benefits.

Also, most of the drugs that are actually ruining people’s lives are coming from American pharmaceutical companies and over-prescribing doctors.

So how did it save them? Did it just drop them inflatables so they could stay afloat? Did it drop them a rope and drag them back to shore? Did it hover over them so the human life guards knew where to swim/boat too? I am not discounting what this drone did or that it did save there lives. I would just like more of the

Mexico with the cartels or Syria with Assad and sarin gas.

Anyone who actually cares about preventing movement over the border would be against building a physical wall. Even the border patrol don’t want it. They want more and better sensors, more man-power, and drones. A wall would be ridiculously ineffective and ridiculously expensive.

This is really lazy writing. Cute, but not useful.

The offensive player cannot enter the crease area to score. Entering is putting a body part onto the floor, so jumping in and releasing (or punching) the ball before you hit the ground is OK.

This is correct, but for a tldr version consider this: hulu offers a live tv package for cheaper than cable. Twc could flat out block it because it takes away from their cable package, unless either hulu or you pay more (either way, you pay nore). It’s not like you can ditch Twc for someone else because let’s face it,

A non-neutral internet will allow data to be prioritized at the sole discretion of ISPs, for whatever reasons they so choose. It gives ISPs unilateral control over the content.

What’s most ironic about megacorporations like Google and Co. vehemently opposing this bullshit is that they are the ones poised to benefit the most from a purely cynical point of view.

I honestly don’t think Bjelica should have been ejected. It looked mostly like self-defense from him, and the headlock ended the violence pretty well.

Note that you still go to jail for manslaughter ;)

Look, you’re overcomplicating things with your nuclear reactor story. We can create perfectly toxic plants through nothing other than traditional cross breeding. Google the Lenape potato.

The way the USDA organic standard treats genetic modification is a joke meant to appease people who deny or misunderstand the science of genetics and agriculture.

Handing out food has the clear potential to “directly affect the health and safety of other people” (unless it’s sealed and not tampered with, I guess. But even then it’s still affecting other people at some level). So no, there is no difference. Arguing “religious freedom” in this case would be absurd (though

But the whole “I get to do whatever I want because of my religion” is a terrible road to go down, which we’re already seeing with Hobby Lobby and wedding cakes.

I’ll believe it when I see the Alexa recording logs.

If Bezos wasn’t on Trump’s radar, she’d just file this under kids being kids.