If the woman consents, by definition it isn't rape. What you are talking about is not consent. You cannot consent under duress. You cannot consent while drunk.

Look, there's no rule that says it isn't rape unless a woman kicks and screams. Sex without consent is rape. Period. Full stop. I can try to explain why a woman doesn't always kick and scream when she's being raped but I can't make you understand. You're placing the burden of not getting raped on the rape victim when…

I do not think women are children. This has nothing to do with infantilizing women and everything to do with not having sex with people who aren't 100% on board with it. It's about respecting women's choices.

Sex requires informed, enthusiastic consent. If you pressure a woman into sex until she either says yes just so you'll stop or she just goes limp and passive, and she clearly is not enjoying it and doesn't want to be there, then yes, that is rape.

Unless you live in Wales, you're probably not.

Yes. Because they are both RAPISTS. Not to mention, rape is always against the victim's will. That's what makes it rape.

Fair enough. No worries.

What do you mean by "the actual numbers"? The size of the sample population that was studied? In that case a larger sample size tells you more than a small one.

What are you trying to say, exactly? 18% of 100 is only 18, but 18% of 10,000 is 1,800. So what difference does it make if there are 100, or 10,000? Your comment doesn't really make any sense.

"Sexy family photo" is pretty much an accurate description of that picture. Whatever is wrong with it cannot be blamed on the language used to describe it.

Emma Golddigger has 163 recs so far so clearly she's tapped into something. The fact that some people disagree doesn't mean anything goes. There are social norms. Learn them.

This has nothing to do with what's legal or illegal, that's not what any of us have been talking about. We're talking about what's appropriate. Breanna Mitchell should show some fucking respect.

Good job with the list but I wish you'd listed them in the reverse order.

The original character was created as a bisexual man for a reason. Several bisexual people have explained why it matters to them that the character be bisexual. Unless you have a really good reason for making the character straight, why would you? We can quibble over exactly how important it is, but if you don't have…

If they like sriracha and Kurt Vonnegut and live in Brooklyn, won't they already know what Manic Pixie Dream Girl means?

Not "by the actual Thor." By the previous Thor.

Kim is a unisex name, you don't know if that's a man or a woman. Could totally be a dude.

Anyone who has eaten at both Burger King and Wendy's knows that Wendy's burgers are better.

What's your point, exactly? Different gospels contain different details. That's why there are four.

I already thought Levine was a douchebag, but nothing in this article convinced me he was any douchier than I already thought he was.