After considering their reality through a historical lens explaining fairly how a group of people brought up in a milieu of faux-meritocratic ideology and inane foreign and domestic policy could be so disaffected by the prospect of participating in democracy, along with other arguments not put forward by the…

I grew up attending a reform temple. I remember a full day, in Hebrew school, dedicated to identifying “Jews of Jesus” and defeating their recruitment techniques a la “what do you do when a stranger offers you candy on the play ground.”

“Last Christmas” is the best holiday song. I will fight you.  

Yes, I am aware. See OP. I am assuming that there was a non-compete as condition of the $69m payout she received. While you might consider it a fiction, that scenario would likely be classified as Kelly voluntarily leaving.

This is a fair point too.  Megyn Kelly stock is at an all time low. 

They might if they are limited in scope, limited in duration and come with a $69m penalty for breaching it. If the non-compete is like no national cable news networks for however long the contract was, and the payout for that promise is $69m, I’d think it has a shot. My assumption is that Kelly will not be able to…

Do we know if the $69m comes with a non-compete?  If it does, it brings forward another question of whether some company paying $69m is worth a world with no Megyn Kelly in it.  put that way, it seems like money well spent.  

I think many will agree that these reports are BS pieces of advocacy designed to absolve the institution and limit the findings of fault as much as possible. In other words, their “independence” is highly suspect.

I think you offered a really fair criticism and I do not really have an answer for Jessica Jones. However, two small points re Daredevil: (1) that comic book was always more popular than the other two; (2) the actor who plays daredevil is just way better at action scenes than the actors who played luke cage or iron…

Wire fraud is just termed in that manner because there needs to be a basis for establishing federal jurisdiction over the criminal act in question. In this case its use of “wires,” i.e. phones and emails, as that imputes interstate commerce. It is easier to just think of it as fraud.

It looks like they only went after the direct actors. Would the testimony at trial likely sustain an indictment concerning a conspiracy charge examining institutional knowledge of those actions? probably, but there is none pending.  

Yea, but that still leaves the rest of the island . . .

If its my opinion that you are a moron whose comments are a complete waste of time, and you state that you are not a moron, am I lying? The answer to this question reveals the difference between statements of opinion and statements of fact.

I did. Look at paragraph two.

Breaking: blogger gets very close, but ultimately fails to understand the difference between statements of opinion and statements of fact. 

The Raiders are a textbook example of crap leadership 101. Alienate and drive away all talent to foment top-down control. The people left in your organization will be those who do not have the ability to go elsewhere. Then, bring in “our guys” to work the magic system Gruden has in mind. Eventually he will blame those…

As someone who has lived on Staten Island, its truly impressive that he was unable to find enough racist pieces of something to fill the room.

Agreed. The Inspector Gadget Movie in 1999 had a lot of these meta aspects as well. Also, like, everything done by the Muppets 

What happens when Kinja is reduced to Russian bots arguing with eachother?

He has an impressive collection of ugly-ass blazers