You’re guilty of reviewing a film you haven’t seen, and I’m guilty of not reading the entire review. We both are not in good form here.

I never expressed any hate for this audience. In fact, as you must have read in my piece, I specifically stated I think most of them are decent people with good hearts.

I wonder what the people who are really obsessed with this movie are taking away from it. Did they not know sex trafficking existed? Do they think they US military should be going into foreign countries and killing traffickers? Because, that seems like a recipe for international disaster.

Plus, the MI movies play well internationally, so I’d say it’ll more than recoup it’s money (but the studio will still claim it lost money when it comes time to pay residuals).

Jim Caviezel is a real piece of work, as is Tim Ballard, who is, oddly and suddenly, no longer with OUR, the organization he founded.

Amazing news, especially after that article came out in which studio people blatantly said they just want to make the writers homeless.

In my case, that is definitely true. I’ve dabbled with some of the other streaming services, but Netflix is the only one I’ve maintained a subscription with since the beginning (either my own or using my SO’s). I’d say a solid 50% of their original content I would never even consider watching, but their back library…

It seems to me the draw of a subscription to any of these streaming services is twofold: the buzzy new, original shows/movies (each of the streamers has at least a few), and the back catalog of older TV shows/movies that will sustain subscribers between seasons of the new stuff.

By depleting the second part of that…

I literally make all of my money as a writer/editor, but go off. You’re talking like your some tech expert and not just an AI fanboy without a creative bone in your body. (Also, your counterpoint about secretaries in your previous response actually only reinforced what I was saying, but I’m not wasting time on that).

Bt…

“You aren’t saying anything that hasn’t been said before”

The irony in you starting this poorly argued response with that statement could build a thousand skyscrapers. You’re literally just regurgitating talking points from the corporations who are investing heavily in this tech. (Why is Elon currently developing AI…

Thank you, Sir/Madam. 

This argument that AI (it’s not AI, but for simplicities sake I use the term) is just another tool in an artist’s toolbox is an exceptionally stupid one, for so many reasons. Let me explain with a long diatribe. You can choose to read this response and consider the points I make, or you can ignore what I write and…

Zaslav is going to end up with a horse's head in his bed if he kills TCM.

I aim to please

By definition, if you use AI to create the work, then you haven’t created any work. If you tell a computer programmer to build you an app, and then they do all the work, can you claim you built the app?

My understanding though is the members still have to vote on it, and that still isn’t settled until June 23. A few high profile directors expressed they'd vote against the deal, so fingers crossed.

You’re literally on a website that posts movie and TV reviews. Me informing you that you’re a brain dead idiot for your bad taste doesn’t take away your free will, you brain dead idiot.

Every time I see someone impressed by “AI” “art”, it’s inevitably the most brain dead, uncreative person imaginable.

Thanks for letting me know of a band I will never check out!

However you feel about Harry and Meghan, knowing they took $20 million from Spotify, currently one of the biggest platforms for antivax cranks, and basically created nothing is objectively funny.