If Ailes manages to prep Trump so he can win the debate, Ailes would be a genius while Clinton would be the biggest debate failure of all times. Remember, Trump is the guy who said the following:

How is it, that certain people were writing about Justin Bieber’s unauthorized dick pics by a paparazzo with glee, yet talk about “the frequently nasty and dark category of Unauthorized Celebrity Nude Photo Posts” when a female celebrity is the victim? Hypocrite much?

Am I the only one shocked but not really shocked that the one time we actually have a female cop shooter, the feminist conspiracy nuts come out in droves on jezebel.

For what? He built up the company from scratch in 1967, decades before the two even met. He offered her roughly $38 million for every year of their marriage and she still wanted more. If that’s not greedy I don’t know what is.

Funny, how a grifter who declined a $1 billion check is hailed as a shero now, simply b/c she hosts a fundraiser for another 1 %er. She initially wanted so much more out of the divorce, that it would have bankrupted the whole business, but then started to spend part of the $1 billion already. Greedy and stupid.

One of the cops got shot, but you couldn’t include this to your comment. Would have detracted from the snark.

Oh, so you think of this more like a ‘prank’ gone awry rather than a religiously motivated act of terrorism? Nothing to see here?

Hillary Clinton collapses in broad daylight in front of cameras. Media speculates about her health-->gutter journalism, right wing conspiracy, this would never have happened to a man...

I thought there was consensus that the first movie was shit, hence the huge dropoff after the opening weekend. Why is this still a thing??? I get it, that there would be a sequel, cuz the movie was successful after all, but why are so many people still watching the trailer?

That suggestion was as serious as Colbert asking if he could be black-ish. Yet there was a whole post, chiding him for asking. Just sayin’.

Wait, English isn’t my first language, but does the meaning of ‘to take something seriously’ not implicate that I reacted to something someone else might or might not have said in jest, rather than you and Sheesh asking me whether I really meant what I said or asking the rhetorical question ‘are you serious’? Honestly…

All parties mentioned are guilty - Jackie for making up a story about rape, Erdeley for omitting even the most basic journalistic standards, like checking the time lines, contacting witnesses mentioned in the story to corroborate Jackie’s account and talking to the accused and last but not least RS Magazine, for…

Take WHAT seriously? The whole post, the insinuation by the writer, that Colbert was serious when asking if he, a white person, could be black-ish, or the condescending remark about about tapping someone on the forehead to shut him up?

You lost me at ‘Um’.

Pro tip - do not tap any person (man, woman or child) gently on the forehead to shut them up. That is waaaayy more demeaning than Colbert’s question could have been, even if he hadn’t asked it in the most mischievous way (which he did). It was his way to start the conversation with his guest, other than asking what’s…