000000001
GypsySix
000000001

You'd be surprised how accurate this comment really is.

That's an m240 variant of machine gun, not an MG42. The MG42 was a staple machine gun of the Nazis in WWII. The 240 is a distant modern nephew at best. Also, hell fucking yeah, the more unmanned fighting equipment the better.

Its a complex answer concerning everything you pointed out, and in the end its not really an answer as much as it is an explanation. I'll give me quick and easy of the uses of a patrol now, and try to tackle armor systems later.

We do not have the option to go without. For us, you must wear all of your protective gear as per SOP. That includes helmet, gloves, and eye protection. I wish we could use our own personal rigs as our gear, I have some personal equipment that is very top notch and provides for a lot of mobility. The current set up

Wow. I wrote up a very large reply to your question. And on my screen it looked like it had posted several times. So I edited the last one to say "Apologies, glitch?", referencing what appeared to be a multi-post. But now it appears that the only remaining post is that one. I'll write it up again soon. Strange...

Those facemasks can only really facilitate urban combat, and by urban combat I really mean MOUT specific, very closed quarters. You simply cannot get a cheek weld with that mask on, long-medium range shooting has got to be neigh impossible. MOUT does not require a cheek-weld and is more centric on body positioning to

Those facemasks can only really facilitate urban combat, and by urban combat I really mean MOUT specific, very closed quarters. You simply cannot get a cheek weld with that mask on, long-medium range shooting has got to be neigh impossible. MOUT does not require a cheek-weld and is more centric on body positioning to

Apologies, glitch?

We do not have the option to go without. For us, you must wear all of your protective gear as per SOP. That includes helmet, gloves, and eye protection. I wish we could use our own personal rigs as our gear, I have some personal equipment that is very top notch and provides for a lot of mobility. The current set up

We do not have the option to go without. For us, you must wear all of your protective gear as per SOP. That includes helmet, gloves, and eye protection. I wish we could use our own personal rigs as our gear, I have some personal equipment that is very top notch and provides for a lot of mobility. The current set up

We do not have the option to go without. For us, you must wear all of your protective gear as per SOP. That includes helmet, gloves, and eye protection. I wish we could use our own personal rigs as our gear, I have some personal equipment that is very top notch and provides for a lot of mobility. The current set up

You are correct, bullet-proof means the material is rated to withstand certain bullets and other pressures at varying levels of frequency. However, you don't need to be shot to be killed. Fragmentation and ricochet are serious issues. We shakedown everybody when we gather ACE reports to ensure that they didn't take

Had to combat a fire outside of the Battalion TOC once, it was a harrowing experience. Truly feared for my life for a moment and had a second of panic before I calmed myself and kept working. It felt like the fire had a mind of its own, it would snap out with serious strength out of nowhere or spring up suddenly where

Being 16 precludes a man from saying that she has pretty eyes? My niece has gorgeous eyes and she is 11. I tell her all the time. They are her aunt's eyes, and my grandmother's eyes (not my mother's unfortunately and not mine). Did that comment really have to insinuate sexual desire of an underage nature? Grow up.

Man I am with you all the way. I am a diehard Peggle fan. Love that shit...

Francis is not Kotaku's patron saint, but most people call him Psycho. If anybody touches his stuff....he'll kill you....

I have really been enjoying Hawken, it is free to play, and not a total pay-to-win nightmare. Anyone else have a positive outlook on Hawken? Or perhaps would like to discuss their negative outlook on it?

I truly cannot discern the meaning behind anything you just said. I am rereading your previous comment and still can't decipher the thought you are trying to push across the table towards me. My best guess if you are upset that I was in a sense sticking up for poor opinions of U.S. war efforts because as a U.S.

Thank you for the response.

Yes, you are correct, the smart devices are always the best option. However:
"Fire" = $ / Smart bomb = $$$$$$.
When we enter countries in war now, we install our own governance/military there. Alot of that has to do with political theory over military theory. We never really leave. (unless its Vietnam or Somalia :P )