Both discussion and conversation involve the exchange of ideas.

I know what power is. I know what life is. I know what death is.

I'm able to interpret the same concept thousands of different ways, thank you very much. It's just that most of the possible ways to interpret something are bullshit mental exercises with little bearing on real life. It's fun to think about, but a lousy thing to base a philosophy on. If you realize that you're…

That is a very unfortunate way to look at life. I'd feel sorry for you, if I knew you weren't just trolling.

Death does not stem from power. That's ridiculous. Death is simply the natural outcome for anything that lives. (Well maybe some very tiny lifeforms are immortal, I'm not sure.)

It's WAY too violent. Don't they know that kid's love The Legend of Zelda? This would never work for what really needs to be a family friendly film.

"placed between a representation of a woman's legs"

"Everything they said is not true" is poor wording, because obviously they said some true things. More accurate would be "not everything they said is true".

True... but other products don't have salesmen so aggressively pushing used copies every time you go into their store to buy a new copy. That's the main difference between video games and every other industry.

Sonic Colors is my very favorite Sonic game. I don't particularly care if it's groundbreaking or not...

It's like they're just begging people to think they don't need to buy it.

I didn't fully read it but I knew it couldn't possibly be real, because we're too close to the release of the game for Nintendo to make any significant changes. Now is the time when they're polishing up what is basically finished, not the time when they would be deciding what new features to add.

So I guess "Gaijin Entertainment" is a different company than "Gaijin" who makes the Bit Trip games?

I'll agree that it's risky to show bad behavior without judgement, but sometimes it's absolutely necessary. That's just the way art is.

But couldn't you choose to just simply show the bigot as they are without making any judgement at all? Art is supposed to hold a mirror up to us all, not tell us what to think.

I think a creator can glorify a bigot or a sexist in their work of fiction and still not be a bigot or a sexist themselves. It's the creators job to manipulate the audience into having an intellectual or emotional response... and they should be able to use whatever techniques they want to do that.

If a character says something offensive, I always assume it's because the character is a bad person not because the creator is a bad person. It's fiction after all. Doesn't that make more sense?

I'm not even sure it's supposed to be a joke. It just sounds like characterization to me... a conversation between people. Like, he's chiding his gay friend for being such a slut, maybe?

They're not the same thing. Trademark, copyright, and patents are the three branches of intellectual property and they all follow different rules.

They also used nyan cat in a trailer for the game. Which means they were using nyan cat to sell scribblenauts.