not counting the 10 billion they’ve already had to put out to make their customers whole, something GM never did.
Zoom-at-Work
zoom-at-work
Now you’re just being willfully dense.
exclusive: yet another commenter blows smoke out their ass without looking at the research. here, let me do the work for you:
mmmmm
That’s one thing I wont google.
“Still putting down more horsepower than an FR-S, amirite?”
You know...if I was to buy a corvette I think one of the things that could really made me happy would be to put all sorts of weird stuff on it, and then have it wrapped in that prototype camo. Fake vents? giant wing? hell, I’ve even mock up some LS heads and headers for under the rear glass for Car and Driver’s sake.
How on earth am I supposed to carry ladies and gentlemen? I’m not a fucking bus.
More people spewing crap everywhere and the uneducated masses believing them.
Why destroy the car that saved Chrysler’s ass, and offered us fun turbo variants at the same time?
budget rallycross cars right there. Sorry you are not Jalop enough to see that.
NO, but I can tell you two of the happiest ignoramuses on the road.
Now if the car wasn’t on fire I’d agree. But...the car was on fire.
Over 90% of modern Ferraris don’t see a track anyway, and nobody buying a sedan is worried about tracking it, so fuck that awful metric.
Because one is just after profits and the other is after fun? I’ve driven both and while they might have similar performance capabilities, they don’t feel at all similar to drive. Vettes just feel a little removed from everything. The steering is just a little softer, the brakes and little softer, the shifter not as…
High art.
“Their comments section is basically the same 35 people who constantly circle jerk the same topics and inside jokes, in between spewing hate towards anything that doesn’t resemble a diesel stick shift Miata wagon.”
Can I find out where I am on the list? I’m curious.
So what you’re saying is that all four Jalopnik editors told you to Chevette?