The rating systems are not an excuse to objectify your own character. Obviously, you're of the opinion that gameplay is more important than characterization. While I value gameplay, the characters are very important to me, and I cannot see in any way, shape, or form how increasing the breast size of a character and…
zixaphir
zixaphir
"It doesn't matter because I don't think it's important"
Thanks to Duke Nukem Forever, the idea of vaporware hype is dead. No one expects Half Life 3 to be great anymore.
But Zynga doesn't make games. They make distractions that serve to hide the way they mine your personal information and steal your friends.
Ruined? Maybe not. But the honesty of her design has definitely been compromised in favor of sexualization. I mean, the message that Square Enix has been sending lately is that they don't want to sell you Lightning as a character. They want to sell you breast physics and a dress up game, with a fluid battle system to…
Take your pick.
And I completely agree with what you're saying.
I'm sorry you've enjoyed shitty FPS and womanizing JRPGs.
[citation needed]
No PC? No purchase.
It makes me feel better, so whatever it does for the market itself isn't entirely relevant. Just like you bitching to me that you don't like me posting about GTAV PC makes you feel better, but isn't going to stop anyone else from posting about GTAV PC.
It makes me feel better, so whatever it does for the market itself isn't entirely relevant.
Does Princess Zelda die? Because I've been clamoring for that to happen since about a year before Twilight Princess was released.
It's pretty much spot on, simplifying things for the time-budget.
Have you ever heard of a placebo effect?
Mike, I don't want to undermine your skill of journalism, but I do honestly doubt that you posted that without thinking of the connotations that would be attached precisely because your character was a woman. Now, I understand "you", in GTAV, are a feminist who does not believe she should be hit on, but then "you" are…
I think to such people, the correct response is, "lol".
Demand drivers markets, so it's not entirely off base.
But then that just points out the absurdity of hiding the "naughty bits" while still "showing the goods".