zixaphir
zixaphir
zixaphir

I've seen 300. I think I was the first commenter in this comment thread to bring it up. I don't see, however, how it's particularly relevant. If you'd like to explain it to me, I'd appreciate it.

I think context is important to understand the argument someone is trying to make. If I were to meet someone dressed much like Wonder Woman, I would very much like to ask them. Unfortunately for me (and possibly fortunate for society), the only types of people I see dressed up like Wonder Woman are cosplayers and

I am not disagreeing with what you're saying, but I do believe gender issues can make for a good character. I don't particularly have a good way of wording it, but essentially overcoming the stigmas associated with your identity, which I believe gender is a part of (whether a character likes it or not) makes for one

I don't believe catering to fanboys is reason to keep things the way they are, especially when it could alienate potential fans. You could argue staying true to your fans is good, but not changing with the times is to stagnate.

I think your point about being surprised she isn't topless is evidence she's dressing to mens benefit. It undermines the rest of your argument.

No, I think they were trying to please men. Ball is in your court.

C'mon Mike. Bones are not armor and you do not want an area like that to be exposed. At the very least, light armor covering the chest should protect the entire chest area.

I'm not a comic fan. I watched a couple episodes of Justice League and it's pretty much run into the ground that she's awesome because she's an Amazon, and that's about it.

Theatrically their armor is depicted as covering about as much as a speedo. Actual Greek armor used in battle differed significantly, and 300 is not an accurate representation of history...

Cult murders. Revealing outfits. High-end booze. THIS IS FINAL FANTASY.

THIS IS FINAL FANTASY

I still don't understand why a product of a matriarchal society dresses to please the men. To this day, that's a concept completely lost on me.

I'll be honest, though. The last FF game I truly enjoyed was 9. I flirted with 10 but the battle system was so silly I couldn't stand to play it for more than an hour at a time. I also flirted with 11, 12 was snore-fest, 13 took way too long to build up any steam and then sort of just fizzled out, 14 is an MMORPG that

Doubt it. Japan is where morality goes to die.

I liked Lightning. Then I hated her. Now I hate what they've done to her. Now I don't buy FF games on release.

My AAA titles generally don't cost me in the upwards of $60, and my rig only cost my around $400 to build and there ain't been a game yet I can't run. Expecting me to buy a console that can't even open e-mail for $200 when I could buy a tablet that could do more than it for the same price is ludicrous.

I've edited my comment to reflect that. I admit it's been a long time since I've looked for games on Android, but it's also long passed the point where I've been interested in looking.

I wanted to buy games on Android, I really did. I ended up with Zenonia. They then added ads to the paid version and then they refused to make sequels on Android. I stopped buying games on Android. (They did eventually release the sequels, but I don't use my android phone anymore)

When video games feel more like a commitment than a pass time, then maybe it's time to take a break from them. I have similar issues with my steam library. The best games for me are the games I can pick up and put down at will. Things that require a time investment are becoming things I try to avoid (I'm looking at

Amazing how everything you said would happen came to happen exactly as you said it would to you.