C'est la vie. I found it considerably more intuitive on the Gamecube than I did any other system. Soul Calibur 3 was a pain in the ass to re-learn how to play. This is just personal experience, but everyone I knew preferred Soul Calibur 2 on GCN.
If a console is holding the games I want hostage, why should I pay their ransom?
I don't want Tekken, I want Soul Calibur. If a developer doesn't understand that different gamers have different tastes, maybe they shouldn't be developing games.
Soul Calibur was an exception to the rule.
I play Minecraft and Katamari Damacy. Graphics are the least important thing I look at when I play a game. If that's riding a "high horse", I'm sorry, but I'll continue to ride it, because if I were on the horse you ride, I'd be saying silly things like, "That looks like an N64 game. How passé", and denying myself…
I get where you're coming from, but I feel having the maturity not to curse is more adult than dropping bombs for the sake of appearing mature.
Thanks for having thehumility to admit mistake and being humble enough to correct it. I appreciate it.
Which is a product I will support.
You know, I liked Soul Calibur 2. I liked it quite a lot... on my Gamecube, which had the best version of the game, with the best control scheme, and with the best exclusive character. It also sold better than the PS2 and xbox versions. So the fact that Namco continues to ignore Nintendo to this day pisses me off to…
More than any other next gen console.
Oh... people still care about graphics on console games...
In other words, it's a fucking gold mine.
Again, just my personal experience with the name and what I witnessed firsthand. I don't think it's a bad name in and of itself, and it's a shame that child-logic could warp it into something sexist. But kids will be kids.
Gameboy
I am not being a dick, and I am not calling Alex Kierkegaard a dick. As you should know by your insistence on literal meaning, the term 'idiot savant' has a very clear meaning, and my using has very intentional nuances relevant to the conversation at hand. I am not outright calling Kierkegaard a moron, but am implying…
I didn't know Adam Savage was in this picture!
Optical Media was really the best thing to happen to gaming. I mean, sure, games could get scratched and that would kinda suck, but they're also not susceptible to bitrot and are considerably cheaper in every conceivable way to cartridges. Just don't put out a handheld gaming system that uses optical.
Alex Kierkegaard is a no-name idiot savant who has no say on what is and isn't an RPG. Also, protip, it isn't a debate if there is no debating. Alex presents his argument as pure fact, with no understanding of the term context. You don't get to redefine a standard term just because you're so anal about the original…