ziddersroofurry
ZiddersRoofurry
ziddersroofurry

I wish your wife the best. One of my partners deals with the same so I’m right there with you.

You show an extreme lack of tact. You might want to try not being such a douche.

Is Billy aware of how the internet works?

This is what I was trying to tell them they needed to do in wildstar.It made zero sense to me to not have flying vehicles in a freaking sci-fi space game. Make people explore then once they’re done exploring give them the ability to zoom around.

You would.

what’s interesting is you’d think that I as a furry and long-time Max fan would see more of this but nope. Guess I’m one of the few willing to be so obvious :/.

It’s meant to be a joke.

My Little Roo-ny:Flexship is Magic

Total Biscuit a pompous ass? Indie developers behaving immaturily?

I dunno...that little cars kinda sexy.

Getting kind of old now :P

When I was growing up my adoptive aunt and I used to watch a lot of movies together. It was she who got me into Star Trek and Indiana Jones and Star Wars. She loved harlequin romances and would get me to read them to her. We also went antiquing and took trips to Broadway to see musicals like Phantom of the Opera. I

Why does anyone care what the BBB thinks?

Do you watch violent movies or play violent games? Why is it OK to slaughter people in those but something like this gets questioned?

It's OK. No real people died when this one sank.

They're multibillion dollar corporations. It's an obscure game from the early 2k's and NOT a big name franchise. It's a question of weighing the potential profit vs the cost of digging up those files. Even if they're only paying someone minimum wage that adds up. Again-they offered the dev team a choice. Pay us up

They're not going to waive their rights. Why would they do that? Those assets are money in the bank even if they sit on the IP. It's all part of their net worth. If they all found the rights (which won't happen without money up front from the devs) a licensing deal might be worked out but none of this matters since

The problem isn't who owns the trademark. The problem is proving who owns the IP rights. The ownership forms stating who the owners are don't exist in digital form. They're on paper in a file cabinet somewhere and none of the corporations involved seem to think it worth paying someone to dig them up.

You missed the point of the article. They're not talking about all guys who are just the ones who go around making a big deal out of it. It's one thing to say 'oh, I'm a feminist, too' when it comes up but to go around bringing it up out of the blue or megaphoning it to every female in site is a bit questionable.