Why not?

seem you say that, and to me it sounds like you’re the one distracting from the real problem, that the overall story arc resolves into another (already resolved) organics vs synthetics, with options my character wouldn’t choose, and a final cutscene which was colored in 3 different colors. While everything you list is…

The problem was that we had been given too many choices, and there was just no way that the developers could’ve possibly respected all of them well. It’s a general problem that choice-driven series face when they’re able to push off the consequences of a choice onto a future dev team.

The reaction to the ME3 ending is not the same as what John Boyega had to endure. Racist losers were trolling him and the screenplays for Eps 8 and 9 did him dirty; he went from a super original and interesting Star Wars character — a Stormtrooper awoken by the Force from brainwashing — to a clown running around…

CryptoBros flooding the comment thread in 3... 2... 1...

OP wants to stay spoiler-free

Unions are a good thing. Police unions are not.

The whole “play to earn” meme seems to appeal solely to transactionally-minded people, who regard anything that doesn’t offer material gain as a waste of time.

A social democracy with a progressive tax structure funding the government to a level where universal healthcare and higher education are available doesn’t preclude someone from becoming wealthy and buying a Porsche. Sweden has like 40 billionaires.

He’s not hoarding it. He’s literally spending it on things (which means it’s taxed and circulates in the economy, unlike the foreign bank accounts that billionaires use to obscure their wealth) and people are getting mad at him.

JFC, I’m defending his choice to purchase what he wants. He followers aren’t entitled to tell him what to do.

Sure, that’s not living in modesty, but it’s his choice and his followers don’t have any say in it. That’s my point.

No “modern online socialist” is demanding we pass legislation to make people give away 99% of their wealth.  Leave the hyperbole at the door, dude.  Socialists want equality and equity - a level playing field that ensures he mega-wealthy are paying their fair share (which they’re not) and that people who are not…

Do his subscribers not the see irony? They donated to him, and in turn he used that money on something for himself. What did they expect him to do, live in poverty?

It was 3 million, and given the current house prices in California... eh, it’s not bad.

In fact, if we were all paid properly for the value we create that our rich overlords steal from us we could all afford Porsches. Socialism is actually *about* the workers getting way more money.

Bunch of bad faith dickheads continue to conflate socialism with intentional destitution. You can be a rich socialist, there’s absolutely nothing contradictory about it.

Wouldn’t an actual socialist consider excess participation in materialism directly detrimental to their long term goals?

Do people expect him to donate 90% of his income and live in artificial poverty for the sake of an image?

So... he can’t be an advocate for socialism and buy a nice car?