To be honest, the vacation expansions were usually the least enjoyable for me. Having to switch between neighborhoods (and sit through the lengthy load process both ways) just to go on vacation was obnoxious.

Three’s issues were largely tied up to how big games got. It’s not an unheard of issue with other big scope games; Bethesda’s RPGs often suffer from it too, save files get bloated over time and performance issues start piling up.

I use tabs like thoughts. I don’t hold them all simultaneously in my head, but with them all open I’m free to quickly switch between them when I want.

Why not use a free antivirus software solution? Plenty of viable options available for Windows.

I imagine you’d have to do something about the guns already out there, but I don’t know why you think it’d be silly. The US is hardly the most dangerous country, but it certainly has an average murder rate higher than countries that actively curtail gun ownership. Including China.

No one claimed preventing them from having guns would prevent them from murdering anyone ever though. But restricting access to guns would still drastically curtail their means of easily murdering people. I find the idea that you shouldn’t do anything because you can’t stop everyone everywhere a bit silly.

Just because it’s free doesn’t mean it gets a pass. Nintendo has played catchup in pretty much every regard involving the internet, and their online account system is still worst of the three (merely HAVING an account is free for all three of them, so let’s not pretend it’s some huge advantage to Nintendo here. For…

Yes, in an attack done with personal weapons, the number of assailants certainly is an important metric. But rather than operate under the assumption that there’s only one central variable, for a point I’m not exactly clear on (I’m guessing to argue that guns aren’t particularly more lethal than knives?), there are…

Are you really comparing an attack made with guns from a single individual to a knife attack committed by 8 people? You don’t think it would have been worse had the 8 had guns in a crowded train station?

I had to look this up, because I can’t say I follow the guy, but he was apparently going to college when he got his start. Yeah, it’s definitely a privilege to have parents pay for college, but the ability to do YouTube videos as a hobby at the same time isn’t especially. And by the time he dropped out, he was likely…

Is that really a thing that applies to people famous for playing video games on the Internet? Like, it’s not really something you can buy your way into. No one’s going to care about your awesome computer if you’re not interesting to watch. Part of what allows these individuals to be successful is how relatively cheap…

Like this hot dog stand job was the genesis of his webcam show setup and all the gear provided...right, sure.

There were some 34 million NESs sold in the Americas alone. Surely you could reserve your ire for a more rare console than the NES? Not every one of them need be meticulously preserved like it was some sort of museum piece.

One of the Terminator comic books apparently uses a human as a temporary “gun case” by having a terminator sealing a pistol sized plasma weapon inside the human.

Woohooing in different places has always been part of the game. Elevators were an option in 3 for example.

In what world do you live in where major gaming outlets ignore large developers because fan sites also cover those large games?

Why are you stuck on this notion of “have to change”? Who’s arguing they have to? And why would paying for it make any difference?

Can we complain? Or are you going to tell everyone to just use something else, like social media networks are all equally interchangeable. You seem preoccupied with the latter.

Not everyone wants a specialized setup just to play retro games.

I wasn’t aware that “free” meant “absolved from all criticism.”