Haha, yeah, not big but wouldn't sell one like that.

shoot me an email at william.o.watts at gmail.com and we can discuss. I feel like talking money on here is in bad taste. Also my ebay listing here will give you an idea.

one blem in the prototype set...

Definitely. Let me know what type of carbs they are and the only question will be whether I have a mold that will work already or I need to make one.

Eisberg4k1 - Email me at william.o.watts at gmail.com. I'm in the process of setting up an ebay store, and have one set listed now, but if you want anything custom it's best to email me.

Shameless plug I know but it's appropriate for this one.

Yes, but if you are putting the COL outside of the rotor, you are expending energy to create negative lift, not something you want to do with a critical load All else being the same, multi rotor has a larger COG range. You can put an aggressive cyclic on a multi rotor or tandem too

Right, but the COL will always be within the rotor disc. Having two or more rotors allows for a greater COG range for a given lifting power, not to mention a better engine power/lifting power ratio, hence the Chinook and the like.

Fair enough. I wasn't saying they were better than a single rotor, just surprisingly stable and agile all things considered.

Exactly. That is the way most of these small RC quadricopters work and they are surprisingly stable and agile.

Yeah, electric motors are pretty damn reliable. and with fixed pitch (variable speed) rotors, the typical wear parts and failure modes of helicopters go out the window.

Yeah, I don't care about this being an automatic at all as long as I can make it hold a gear on the overrun to get it to crackle and pop like that deliberately.

So, I'm somewhat adventurous. I ride a motorcycle daily and love the typical thrill sports.

OK, fine. Sarcasm noted. But the fact is misleading title+bogus claim+sarcastic comment when questioned can lead to a bit of confusion.

Yeah, engine mounted transversely vs longitudinally in the F1 car, no pushrod suspension, clearly completely different chassis (not to mention the engine was load bearing and the only thing connecting the rear wheels to the front monocoque in the JS27, something clearly not true in the Pug). I too will have to call BS…

Doesn't look like the lambo was going THAT fast.

I can see why the guys would want grip, but the fact is, at the yaw angles these guys are reaching, the wings, dive planes, splitters and the like will be doing VERY little. There is a reason why the higher the downforce to weight ratio a car has, the slower it is when sideways. It is nearly impossible to build a car…

That is shockingly convincing at a glance.

That's actually on the lower side of sportbike motors. They're hovering at 200hp/liter now. You can make a ton of power if you're willing to rev to 15k...

By the sound of it he's either pedaling it or breaking all four loose with every shift. either way dat shit cray.